What has transcendental deduction proven?: Série 2

Kant E-Prints 3:287-292 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This short paper intends to point some evidences that Kant's Transcendental Deduction of the categories should be read as an argument whose goal is to demonstrate that a discursive intellect has to be able to know objects, since otherwise a representation would not be able to be ascribed to the “I”

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Kant’s Deduction and Apperception: Explaining the Categories.Dennis Schulting - 2012 - London and Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave-Macmillan.
The Proof Structure of Kant's A-Deduction.Michael Barker - 2001 - Kant Studien 92 (3):259-282.
Kant’s Non-Conceptualism, Rogue Objects, and The Gap in the B Deduction.Robert Hanna - 2011 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 19 (3):399 - 415.
The Two Steps of the B-Deduction.Markku Leppäkoski - 1998 - Kantian Review 2:107-116.
A Transcendental Deduction of the Categories Without the Categories.John Rosenthal - 1993 - International Philosophical Quarterly 33 (4):449-464.
Kant, Hume, and Problems of the Deduction of the Categories.V. V. Vasil'ev - 1996 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 34 (4):51-65.
The Role of Kant’s Refutation of Idealism.Ralf M. Bader - 2012 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 94 (1):53-73.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-02

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references