Science and Engineering Ethics 25 (2):643-644 (2019)
| Abstract |
Evaluation of scientific research is essential to judge the impact of research and the author. In this regard, a newly devised Leiden Manifesto describes 10 principles for guiding research evaluation. The principles need to be analyzed critically and adapted as a preferred method of research evaluation.
|
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| ISBN(s) | |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11948-017-0012-2 |
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Challenges in Studying the Effects of Scientific Societies on Research Integrity.Felice J. Levine & Joyce M. Iutcovich - 2003 - Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (2):257-268.
On the Evaluation of Research in the Humanities, Particularly in Philosophy.Diego Marconi - 2012 - Iride: Filosofia e Discussione Pubblica 25 (3):451-474.
The Evaluation Scale: Exploring Decisions About Societal Impact in Peer Review Panels.Gemma E. Derrick & Gabrielle N. Samuel - 2016 - Minerva 54 (1):75-97.
Manifesto for a Postcolonial International Business and Management Studies: A Provocation.R. I. Westwood & G. Jack - 2007 - .
La prise en compte de l’expertise dans les évaluations conduites par l’AERES.Didier Houssin - 2012 - Hermès: La Revue Cognition, communication, politique 64 (3):, [ p.].
Use and Misuse of Metrics in Research Evaluation.Ronald N. Kostoff - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (2):109-120.
Scientific Societies and Research Integrity: What Are They Doing and How Well Are They Doing It?Margot Iverson, Mark S. Frankel & Sanyin Siang - 2003 - Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (2):141-158.
Core Competitiveness of University Scientific Research and Its Evaluation.Shou-hua Zhang, Cheng-yi Hou & Juan-ru Wang - 2005 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 35 (3):129-131.
Efficiency – Model for Scientific Research Evaluation.Panaite Nica & Silviu Mihail Tita - 2013 - Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala 5 (1):141-159.
The Principles and Practices of Peer Review.Ronald N. Kostoff - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1):19-34.
Plagiarism in Student Research: Responsibility of the Supervisors and Suggestions to Ensure Plagiarism Free Research.Kewal Krishan, Tanuj Kanchan, Neha Baryah & Richa Mukhra - 2017 - Science and Engineering Ethics 23 (4):1243-1246.
Scholarly communication development as a modernization basis for the research performance assessment and evaluation.Mikhail Kogalovsky, Ivan Nevolin & Sergei Parinov - 2017 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 51 (1):188-205.
Understanding Risks and Benefits in Research on Reproductive Genetic Technologies.Janet Malek - 2007 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32 (4):339 – 358.
Publication Ethics and the Research Assessment Exercise: Reflections on the Troubled Question of Authorship.A. Sheikh - 2000 - Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (6):422-426.
A Nursing Manifesto: An Emancipatory Call for Knowledge Development, Conscience, and Praxis.Paula N. Kagan, Marlaine C. Smith, I. I. I. Cowling & Peggy L. Chinn - 2010 - Nursing Philosophy 11 (1):67-84.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2017-12-21
Total views
5 ( #1,199,441 of 2,499,305 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #418,195 of 2,499,305 )
2017-12-21
Total views
5 ( #1,199,441 of 2,499,305 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #418,195 of 2,499,305 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
