Are the Distinctions Drawn in the Debate about End-of-Life Decision Making “Principled”? If Not, How Much Does It Matter?

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 40 (1):66-84 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The current ethical-legal consensus — prohibiting assisted suicide and euthanasia, but (1) allowing patients to forgo all life-saving treatment, and (2) permitting pain relief that increases the risk of death — is a means of having it both ways. This is how we often make “tragic choices.”

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,612

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-28

Downloads
28 (#138,667)

6 months
8 (#1,326,708)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Do the Suffering Deserve Special Treatment?Michelle Jessica Bayefsky - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (3):37 - 39.
The Graying of America: Challenges and Controversies.Robert M. Sade - 2012 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 40 (1):6-9.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Voluntary active euthanasia.Dan W. Brock - 1992 - Hastings Center Report 22 (2):10-22.
Life and death: philosophical essays in biomedical ethics.Dan W. Brock - 1993 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
How we die: reflections on life's final chapter.Sherwin B. Nuland - 1994 - New York: Published by Random House Large Print in association with Alfred A. Knopf.
Terminal sedation: Pulling the sheet over our eyes.Margaret P. Battin - 2008 - Hastings Center Report 38 (5):pp. 27-30.
How We Die.Joseph J. Fins & Sherwin B. Nuland - 1995 - Hastings Center Report 25 (2):38.

View all 17 references / Add more references