Rule consequentialism and disasters
Philosophical Studies 162 (2):219-236 (2013)
Abstract
Rule consequentialism (RC) is the view that it is right for A to do F in C if and only if A's doing F in C is in accordance with the the set of rules which, if accepted by all, would have consequences which are better than any alternative set of rules (i.e., the ideal code). I defend RC from two related objections. The first objection claims that RC requires obedience to the ideal code even if doing so has disastrous results. Though some rule consequentialists embrace a disaster-clause which permits agents to disregard some of the rules in the ideal code as a necessary means of avoiding disasters, they have not adequately explained how this clause works. I offer such an explanation and show how it fits naturally with the rest of RC. The second disaster objection asserts that even if RC can legitimately invoke a disaster-clause, it lacks principled grounds from distinguishing disasters from non-disasters. In response, I explore Hooker's suggestion that “disaster” is vague. I contend that every plausible ethical theory must invoke something similar to a disaster clause. So if “disaster” is vague, then every plausible ethical theory faces a difficulty with it. As a result, this vagueness is not a reason to prefer other theories to RC. However, I argue, contra Hooker, that the sense of “disaster” relevant to RC is not vague, and RC does indeed have principled grounds to distinguish disasters from nondisasters.Author's Profile
DOI
10.1007/s11098-011-9756-8
My notes
Similar books and articles
The demandingness objection.Brad Hooker - 2009 - In T. Chappell (ed.), The Problem of Moral Demandingness. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 148-162.
Gauging the societal impacts of natural disasters using a capability approach.Colleen Murphy & Paolo Gardoni - 2010 - Disasters 34 (3):619-636.
Rule Consequentialism and Scope.Leonard Kahn - 2012 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (5):631-646.
Disaster semiotics: An alternative ‘global semiotics’?Han-Liang Chang - 2006 - Sign Systems Studies 34 (1):215-229.
Sophisticated rule consequentialism: Some simple objections.Richard Arneson - 2005 - Philosophical Issues 15 (1):235–251.
Ideal Code, Real World: A Rule-Consequentialist Theory of Morality.Brad Hooker - 2000 - Oxford University Press.
From the margins to the mainstream? Disaster research at the crossroads.Kathleen J. Tierney - manuscript
Recovery From Natural and Man-Made Disasters As Capabilities Restoration and Enhancement.C. Murphy & P. Gardoni - 2008 - International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning 3 (4):1-17.
Law in Crisis: The Ecstatic Subject of Natural Disaster.Ruth Austin Miller - 2009 - Stanford University Press.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-09-30
Downloads
117 (#108,233)
6 months
3 (#225,457)
2010-09-30
Downloads
117 (#108,233)
6 months
3 (#225,457)
Historical graph of downloads