Who Was Callicles? Exploring Four Relationships between Rhetoric and Justice in Plato's Gorgias

Philosophy and Rhetoric 54 (3):263-288 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACT The Gorgias presents us with a mystery and an enigma: Who was Callicles? And, what was Plato trying to accomplish in this dialogue? While searching for the identity of Callicles, we gain a better understanding of Plato's purpose for this dialogue, which is to use justice as a means for staking out the boundaries of four types of rhetoric. This article argues that Plato uses the Gorgias to reveal the deficiencies of sophistic nomos-centered rhetorics and an unjust sophistic phusis-centered rhetoric, opening the door for a “true” rhetoric that he articulates in the Phaedrus and a universal justice based on virtue that he describes in the Republic.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Gorgias and Rhetoric.Joe Sachs (ed.) - 2008 - Focus.
The Question of Temperance and Hedonism in Callicles.Kristian Urstad - 2011 - Leeds International Classical Studies.
Socrates's Great Speech: The Defense of Philosophy in Plato's Gorgias.Tushar Irani - 2021 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 59 (3):349-369.
Rhetoric beyond Arguments: Thinking about the Role of Fictional Audiences in Plato’s Gorgias.Dora Suarez - 2020 - Elenchos: Rivista di Studi Sul Pensiero Antico 41 (2):217-243.
Shame and Ambiguity in Plato’s Gorgias.R. Bensen Cain - 2008 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 41 (3):pp. 212-237.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-09-26

Downloads
39 (#408,568)

6 months
14 (#179,578)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

In Defence of Rhetoric.Brian Vickers - 1989 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 22 (4):294-299.
What Plato Said.A. E. Taylor & Paul Shorey - 1933 - Philosophical Review 42 (6):627.
The socratic paradoxes.Gerasimos Santas - 1964 - Philosophical Review 73 (2):147-164.

View all 18 references / Add more references