The Question of Temperance and Hedonism in Callicles

Leeds International Classical Studies (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Callicles, Socrates’ main interlocutor in Plato’s Gorgias, has traditionally been interpreted as a kind of sybaritic hedonist, as someone who takes the ultimate goal in life to consist in the pursuit of physical pleasures and, further, as someone who refuses to accept the value of any restraint at all on a person’s desire. Such an interpretation turns Callicles into a straw man and Plato, I argue, did not create Callicles only to have him knocked down in this easy way. Plato’s construction of Callicles’ position is much more formidable and not reducible to any simple classification. In the first part of this paper, I challenge the traditional interpretation of Callicles. In the second, I speculate as to why Plato has attributed this much more formidable position to Callicles, one which Socrates is never really made to get at the heart of.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,867

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-08-05

Downloads
128 (#141,083)

6 months
5 (#836,928)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kristian Urstad
Douglas College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references