The Ontological Argument

Philosophy 50 (191):69 - 80 (1975)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There are several styles of ontological argument. Here are examples of the first style. God has all perfections. Existence is a perfection. ∴God exists. All perfect beings exist. God is a perfect being. ∴God exists. God couldn't be improved. A being that doesn't exist could be improved . ∴God exists

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,990

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Ontological Argument.Robert Merrihew Adams - 1994 - In Adams Robert Merrihew (ed.), Leibniz: determinist, theist, idealist. New York: Oxford University Press.
Anselm's Ontological Argument: Rationalistic or Apologetic?Hugh R. Smart - 1949 - Review of Metaphysics 3 (2):161 - 166.
Leibniz and the ontological argument.Barry Loewer - 1978 - Philosophical Studies 34 (1):105 - 109.
Alvin Plantinga on the ontological argument.William L. Rowe - 2009 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 65 (2):87 - 92.
An Epistemological and Semiotic Approach of Ontological Argument.Ionel Narita - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 75:181-185.
The Ontological Argument.Sara L. Uckelman - 2011-09-16 - In Michael Bruce & Steven Barbone (eds.), Just the Arguments. Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 25–27.
The Ontological Argument and the Concept of Substance.J. Michael Young - 1974 - American Philosophical Quarterly 11 (3):181 - 191.
Spinoza's "ontological" argument.Don Garrett - 1979 - Philosophical Review 88 (2):198-223.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
42 (#369,536)

6 months
6 (#700,872)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James Cargile
University of Virginia

References found in this work

Anselm's ontological arguments.Norman Malcolm - 1960 - Philosophical Review 69 (1):41-62.
The logical structure of Anselm's arguments.Robert Merrihew Adams - 1971 - Philosophical Review 80 (1):28-54.

Add more references