Chunk‐Based Memory Constraints on the Cultural Evolution of Language

Topics in Cognitive Science 12 (2):713-726 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

How linguistic structures evolve so as to become easier to process is addressed by Isbilen and Christiansen for the Now‐or‐Never bottleneck. The authors suggest that this fundamental challenge in language processing is coped with by rapid compression of the transient linguistic input into chunks then to be passed on. As linguistic structures that can be chunked more easily tend to stabilize and proliferate, language evolves to fit learners’ cognitive capabilities.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Long-term memory span.James S. Nairne & Ian Neath - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (1):134-135.
Modeling Co‐evolution of Speech and Biology.Bart Boer - 2016 - Topics in Cognitive Science 8 (2):459-468.
Analysis on Mental Structures in Language Learning.Ya-Ping Cui - 2005 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 35 (3):147-150.
Brain evolution: How constrained is it?Georg F. Striedter - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (2):296-297.
Language evolution: Two tracks are not enough.A. Charles Catania - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (5):451-452.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-09-07

Downloads
28 (#566,590)

6 months
5 (#625,196)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Natural language and natural selection.Steven Pinker & Paul Bloom - 1990 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (4):707-27.
Natural selection and natural language.Steven Pinker & Paul Bloom - 1990 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (4):707-784.
Language as shaped by the brain.Morten H. Christiansen & Nick Chater - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (5):489-509.

View all 20 references / Add more references