- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Strong inconsistency
Artificial Intelligence 267 (C):78-117 (2019)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Paraconsistency and Plausible Argumentation in Generative Grammar: A Case Study. [REVIEW]András Kertész & Csilla Rákosi - 2013 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 22 (2):195-230.
Review: Gerhard Brewka, Nonmonotonic Reasoning: Logical Foundations of Commonsense. [REVIEW]Heinrich Herre - 1993 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 58 (3):1079-1080.
Ojeda-aciego Manuel 1, Brewka Gerhard 2, de Guzman inma P. 1, Pereira Luis moniz 3.Logica Studia - 2002 - Studia Logica 72 (1):3-5.
Klaus Fischer Jorg P. Muller Markus pischel.AGenDA—A. General Testbed - 1996 - In N. Jennings & G. O'Hare (eds.), Foundations of Distributed Artificial Intelligence. Wiley. pp. 9--401.
A correction to “Nonmonotonic inconsistency” [Artificial Intelligence 149 (2003) 161–178].Charles B. Cross - 2004 - Artificial Intelligence 160 (1-2):191-192.
On the complexity of inconsistency measurement.Matthias Thimm & Johannes P. Wallner - 2019 - Artificial Intelligence 275 (C):411-456.
Relative inconsistency measures.Philippe Besnard & John Grant - 2020 - Artificial Intelligence 280 (C):103231.
On the expressivity of inconsistency measures.Matthias Thimm - 2016 - Artificial Intelligence 234 (C):120-151.
Brewka, Gerhard / Dix, Jürgen / Konolige, Kurt: Nonmonotonic Reasoning. An Overview, Stanford University, Stanford, 1997, 179 págs. [REVIEW]Carlos Ortiz de Landázuri - 1999 - Anuario Filosófico:844-845.
Inconsistency measures for probabilistic logics.Matthias Thimm - 2013 - Artificial Intelligence 197 (C):1-24.
Analytics
Added to PP
2020-12-22
Downloads
5 (#847,061)
6 months
10 (#1,198,792)
2020-12-22
Downloads
5 (#847,061)
6 months
10 (#1,198,792)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Handling and measuring inconsistency in non-monotonic logics.Markus Ulbricht, Matthias Thimm & Gerhard Brewka - 2020 - Artificial Intelligence 286 (C):103344.
Explainable acceptance in probabilistic and incomplete abstract argumentation frameworks.Gianvincenzo Alfano, Marco Calautti, Sergio Greco, Francesco Parisi & Irina Trubitsyna - 2023 - Artificial Intelligence 323 (C):103967.
References found in this work
On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games.Phan Minh Dung - 1995 - Artificial Intelligence 77 (2):321-357.
Nonmonotonic reasoning, preferential models and cumulative logics.Sarit Kraus, Daniel Lehmann & Menachem Magidor - 1990 - Artificial Intelligence 44 (1-2):167-207.
What does a conditional knowledge base entail?Daniel Lehmann & Menachem Magidor - 1992 - Artificial Intelligence 55 (1):1-60.
A theory of diagnosis from first principles.Raymond Reiter - 1987 - Artificial Intelligence 32 (1):57-95.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-zhzfn uwo