Androcentrism as a fallacy of argumentation

Abstract

The deep operation of androcentrism in scientific argumentation demands recognition as a form of fallacy. On Walton’s account, fallacies are serious mistakes in argumentation that employ presumptions acceptable in other circumstances. There are only isolated cases in which androcentric pre-sumptions are acceptable, and I argue that androcentrism affects an overarching theme of generalization in science rather than an isolated scheme. Androcentrism is related to other ways of treating privileged people as exemplary humans, whose negative impact on processes of argumentation can be described as the fallacy of “appeal to the standard.”

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,855

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-02

Downloads
12 (#816,713)

6 months
2 (#257,917)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Catherine Elisabeth Hundleby
University of Windsor

References found in this work

Studies in the Way of Words.Paul Grice - 1989 - Philosophy 65 (251):111-113.
A Pragmatic Theory of Fallacy.Douglas Walton - 2003 - University Alabama Press.
Coalescent Argumentation.Michael A. Gilbert - 1995 - Argumentation 9 (5):837-852.
Studies in the Way of Words.Robert J. Fogelin - 1991 - Journal of Philosophy 88 (4):213-219.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work

Feminist Perspectives on Argumentation.Catherine E. Hundleby - forthcoming - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Mendus on Philosophy and Pervasiveness.Iddo Landau - 1997 - Philosophical Quarterly 47 (186):89–93.
Two Forms of the Straw Man.Robert Talisse & Scott F. Aikin - 2006 - Argumentation 20 (3):345-352.
Reductionism in Fallacy Theory.Christoph Lumer - 2000 - Argumentation 14 (4):405-423.
Poisoning the Well.Douglas Walton - 2006 - Argumentation 20 (3):273-307.