The Case of the Female Orgasm: Bias in the Science of Evolution

Hypatia 22 (3):218-222 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,745

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Case of the Female Orgasm: Bias in the Science of Evolution.Lisa Gannett - 2007 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 37 (4):619-638.
Review of Melanie Frappier, Letitia Meynell and James Robert Brown: Thought Experiments in Science, Philosophy, and the Arts[REVIEW]Darrell P. Rowbottom - 2015 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 5 (2):348-352.
Introduction: Minding Bodies.–Sue campbell, Letitia Meynell, Susan Sherwin.Letitia Meynell - 2009 - In Sue Campbell, Letitia Meynell & Susan Sherwin (eds.), Embodiment and Agency. Pennsylvania State University Press. pp. 1--21.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
54 (#98,306)

6 months
9 (#1,260,759)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Letitia Meynell
Dalhousie University

Citations of this work

Feminist Philosophy of Science: Standpoint Matters.Alison Wylie - 2012 - Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophy Association 86 (2):47-76.
The psychology of scientific explanation.J. D. Trout - 2007 - Philosophy Compass 2 (3):564–591.
Understanding Epistemic Trust Injustices and Their Harms.Heidi Grasswick - 2018 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 84:69-91.

View all 36 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references