Self and pretence: Playing with identity

Journal of Social Philosophy 39 (4):564-582 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper considers the importance of play as a conventional space for hypothetical self-expression and self-trial, its importance for determination of identity, and for development of self-possibilities. Expanding such possibilities in play enables challenging of socially entrenched assumptions concerning possible and appropriate identities. Discussion is extended to the contexts of gender performance (drag) and sport-play. It is argued that play proceeds on the basis of a fundamental pretence of reality that must be taken seriously by its participants; this discussion includes considerations of serious and ironical play, “playing-at”, and travesty.

Similar books and articles

Play, performance, and the docile athlete.Leslie A. Howe - 2007 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 1 (1):47 – 57.
The Virtue of Playing Along.Sharon Kaye - 2007 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 14 (1):1-10.
Convention, Audience, and Narrative: Which Play is the Thing?Leslie A. Howe - 2011 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 38 (2):135-148.
Pedagogy of play.Roberto Farné - 2005 - Topoi 24 (2):169-181.
The autism objection to pretence theories.David Liggins - 2010 - Philosophical Quarterly 60 (241):764-782.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
330 (#59,412)

6 months
107 (#37,407)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Leslie A. Howe
University of Saskatchewan

Citations of this work

Gender Roles Roll.Pam R. Sailors - 2013 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 7 (2):245-258.
Ludonarrative dissonance and dominant narratives.Leslie A. Howe - 2017 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 44 (1):44-54.
Express yourself: the value of theatricality in soccer.Kenneth Aggerholm - 2013 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 40 (2):205 - 224.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

How to do things on stage.David Z. Saltz - 1991 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 49 (1):31-45.

Add more references