Convention, Audience, and Narrative: Which Play is the Thing?

Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 38 (2):135-148 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper argues against the conception of sport as theatre. Theatre and sport share the characteristic that play is set in a conventionally-defined hypothetical reality, but they differ fundamentally in the relative importance of audience and the narrative point of view. Both present potential for participants for development of selfhood through play and its personal possibilities. But sport is not essentially tied to audience as is theatre. Moreover, conceptualising sport as a form of theatre valorises the spectator’s narrative as normative for sport experience over that of the participant athlete or player, eliding player experience. Imposition of external narratives over experience risks fossilising interpretation and inhibits the beneficial effects of play for self-realisation, especially as a form of self-examination and creation through internal self-narrative.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-11-15

Downloads
625 (#42,954)

6 months
114 (#50,440)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Leslie A. Howe
University of Saskatchewan

Citations of this work

Ludonarrative dissonance and dominant narratives.Leslie A. Howe - 2017 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 44 (1):44-54.
Sport, stories, and morality: a Rortyan approach to doping ethics.Morten Renslo Sandvik - 2019 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 46 (3):383-400.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Grasshopper: Games, Life and Utopia.Bernard Suits & Thomas Hurka - 1978 - Peterborough, CA: Broadview Press.
Giving an Account of Oneself.Judith Butler - 2005 - New York: Fordham University Press.
Triad Trickery: Playing With Sport and Games.Klaus V. Meier - 1988 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 15 (1):11-30.

View all 10 references / Add more references