Law and Logic. A Critical Account of Legal Argument

Journal of Symbolic Logic 39 (3):619-619 (1974)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.2307/2272934

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,846

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Review: Joseph Horovitz, Law and Logic. A Critical Account of Legal Argument. [REVIEW]Nicholas A. Vonneuman - 1974 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 39 (3):619-619.
Book Review:Law and Logic: A Critical Account of Legal Argument. Joseph Horovitz. [REVIEW]Lawrence C. Becker - 1973 - Ethics 84 (1):89-.
Logic and Law: A Critical Account of Legal Argument. By Joseph Horovitz. New York and Wien: Springer-Verlag, 1972. Pp.xvi, 213. [REVIEW]William Eastman - 1974 - Dialogue 13 (3):630-631.
Ulrich Klug's Legal Logic. A critical account'.Joseph Horovitz - 1966 - Logique Et Analyse 33 (33):78.
AI & Law, Logic and Argument Schemes.Henry Prakken - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (3):303-320.
Legality Without the Rule of Law? Scott Shapiro on Wicked Legal Systems: Critical Notice: Legality by Scott Shapiro.David Dyzenhaus - 2012 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 25 (1):183-200.
Legal logic? Or can we do without?Arend Soeteman - 2003 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 11 (2-3):197-210.
Advances in the Theory of Argumentation Schemes and Critical Questions.David Godden & Douglas Walton - 2007 - Informal Logic 27 (3):267-292.
Arguments that take Counterconsiderations into Account.Jan Albert van Laar - 2014 - Informal Logic 34 (3):240-275.
The Three Types of Aim-based Legal Arguments.Liang Qing-Yin - unknown
On relationships between the logic of law, legal positivism and semiotics of law.Vadim Verenich - 2011 - Sign Systems Studies 39 (2/4):145-195.
Legal realism regained: saving realism from critical acclaim.Wouter De Been - 2008 - Stanford, Calif.: Stanford Law Books.
Dworkin's Theoretical Disagreement Argument.Barbara Baum Levenbook - 2015 - Philosophy Compass 10 (1):1-9.
Logic, Art and Argument.Leo Groarke - 1996 - Informal Logic 18 (2).
Gardner on Legal Reasoning.Fábio P. Shecaira - 2014 - Law and Philosophy 33 (6):747-772.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-05

Downloads
10 (#1,192,632)

6 months
5 (#637,009)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references