5 found
Order:
  1. De Grenzen van Het Goede Leven: Rechtsgeleerde Opstellen Aangeboden Aan Prof.Arend Soeteman & Olaf Tans (eds.) - 2009 - Ars Aequi Libri.
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2.  14
    Wetenschappelijke rechtsgeleerdheid.Arend Soeteman - 2009 - Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy 38 (3):226-235.
    This article is a comment on Carel Smith’s paper. Smith rightly argues that the study of law has a hermeneutic character. But his interpretation of legal hermeneutics includes the thesis that in hard cases there is no right or true legal decision. This seems to have negative implications for the scholarly character of the study of law: in hard cases any solution goes. This paper argues, against Smith, that the study of law defends right answers for hard cases. It is (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  8
    Nicholas Wolterstorff, Justice: Rights and Wrongs. Princeton and Oxford 2008: Princeton University Press. XXI + 400 Pages. ISBN 978-0691129679. [REVIEW]Arend Soeteman - 2010 - Philosophia Reformata 75 (1):90-93.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  41
    Legal Logic? Or Can We Do Without?Arend Soeteman - 2003 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 11 (2-3):197-210.
    In this paper the thesis is argued that there is no need for a special legal logic to deal with the defeasibility of legal arguments. An important argument for this thesis is that legal judgements ask for a complete justification and that such a complete justification requires a deductively valid argument.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  5.  5
    Rechtsbeginselen en positivisme!?Arend Soeteman - 2009 - Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy 38 (1):5-10.
    In this contribution I argue that Brouwer’s legal positivism suffers from an internal tension that is not easily solved. This tension stems from the combination of two strands in Brouwer’s thought. The first is that Brouwer wants to stick to the legal positivist view that the law is fixed by convention. The second is that there can be exceptions to the application of legal rules, based on legal principles. The combination of these two strands is, I argue, problematic, because the (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark