Ethics education at NSF: Commentary on “standards for evaluating proposals to develop ethics curricula”

Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (3):509-511 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s11948-005-0021-4

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,045

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Ethics education at NSF: Commentary on “standards for evaluating proposals to develop ethics curricula” (V. Weil). [REVIEW]Rachelle D. Hollander - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (3):509-511.
How many degrees of separation? Preparation, proximity and professionalism: Commentary on ‘help from faculty: Findings from the Acadia institute graduate education study’.C. K. Gunsalus - 2001 - Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (4):505-506.
“Sherry’s Secret”: Case study and commentary on research ethics.Leslie R. Sims - 2001 - Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (1):147-150.
Standards for evaluating proposals to develop ethics curricula.Vivian Weil - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (3):501-507.
Commentary on “transforming science curricula in higher education: Feminist contributions” (b. spanier).Bonnie Shulman - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (4):481-484.
Mentoring and ethical beliefs in graduate education in science: Commentary on ‘influences on the ethical beliefs of graduate students concerning research’.Rachelle D. Hollander - 2001 - Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (4):521-524.
Beyond course-based engineering ethics instruction: Commentary on “topics and cases for online education in engineering”.Debbie Chachra - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (3):459-461.
Underrepresentation in the real world.Daryl E. Chubin - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (1):7-10.
Review of Deborah G. Mayo and Rachelle D. Hollander: Acceptable Evidence: Science and Values in Risk Management. [REVIEW]Vivian Weil - 1994 - Ethics 104 (3):651-652.
Review of Deborah G. Mayo and Rachelle D. Hollander: Acceptable Evidence: Science and Values in Risk Management. [REVIEW]Vivian Weil - 1994 - Ethics 104 (3):651-652.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
49 (#316,900)

6 months
5 (#837,836)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Teaching Health Law.Roberta M. Berry - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (4):694-703.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Standards for evaluating proposals to develop ethics curricula.Vivian Weil - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (3):501-507.

Add more references