Philosophy and Social Criticism 33 (6):756-778 (2007)
AbstractFrom the early to mid-1970s, Michel Foucault posited that power consists of a relation rather than a substance and that this relation is comprised of unequal forces engaged in a warlike struggle against each other, resulting invariably in the domination of some forces over others. This understanding of power, which he retrospectively dubbed `Nietzsche's hypothesis' and `the model of war', underpinned his well-known analyses of disciplinary power. Yet, Foucault in his Collège de France course from the academic year 1975-6, `Society Must Be Defended', suddenly began to call into question this understanding and his doubts about it did not abate well into the late 1970s. In this article, we suggest that his militant politics in the early 1970s sustained his adherence to the war model and that his more cautious political attitude later in the decade underpinned his suspicions about this model. Key Words: biopolitics • Henri de Boulainvilliers • Michel Foucault • Thomas Hobbes • militancy • F. W. Nietzsche • politics • power • race • war
Similar books and articles
Foucault’s Politicization of Ontology.Johanna Oksala - 2010 - Continental Philosophy Review 43 (4):445-466.
Foucault on Politics, Security and War.Michael Dillon & Andrew Neal (eds.) - 2008 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
“Society Must Be Defended” and the Last Foucault.Julian Bourg - 2004 - Radical Philosophy Review 7 (1):1-16.
Forms of Resistance: Foucault on Tactical Reversal and Self-Formation. [REVIEW]Kevin Thompson - 2003 - Continental Philosophy Review 36 (2):113-138.
The Power Not to Be (What We Are): The Politics and Ethics of Self-Creation in Foucault.Benda Hofmeyr - 2006 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 3 (2):215-230.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Entering the Archive: “Il Faut Défendre la Société” and Michel Foucault’s Critical Archeological Inquiry Into the History and Method of Genealogy.Michiel T'Jampens & Jelle Versieren - 2020 - Critical Horizons 21 (3):240-263.
References found in this work
No references found.