Parfit’s Mixed Maxim Objection against the Formula of Universal Law Reconsidered

Journal of Value Inquiry 58 (1):13-32 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Obligatory Actions, Obligatory Maxims.Samuel Kahn - 2021 - Kantian Review 26 (1):1-25.
Maxims and Practical Contradictions.Richard Galvin - 2011 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 28 (4):407.
Two Dogmas of Kantian Ethics.Scott Forschler - 2013 - Journal of Value Inquiry 47 (3):255-269.
Willing Universal Law vs. Universally Lawful Willing.Scott Forschler - 2010 - Southwest Philosophy Review 26 (1):141-152.
Advice for Non-analytical Naturalists.Janice Dowell, J. L. & David Sobel - 2017 - In Simon Kirchin (ed.), Reading Parfit. Routledge. pp. 153-171.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-10-30

Downloads
24 (#644,297)

6 months
13 (#185,383)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Martin Sticker
University of Bristol

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Practice of Moral Judgment.Barbara Herman - 1985 - Journal of Philosophy 82 (8):414.
Kant's Universal Law Formula Revisited.Sven Nyholm - 2015 - Metaphilosophy 46 (2):280-299.
Do We Always Act on Maxims?Sven Nyholm - 2017 - Kantian Review 22 (2):233-255.
Thinking about Cases: Applying Kant's Universal Law Formula.Jochen Bojanowski - 2017 - European Journal of Philosophy 26 (4):1253-1268.

View all 9 references / Add more references