Gentzen and Jaśkowski Natural Deduction: Fundamentally Similar but Importantly Different

Studia Logica 102 (6):1103-1142 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Gentzen’s and Jaśkowski’s formulations of natural deduction are logically equivalent in the normal sense of those words. However, Gentzen’s formulation more straightforwardly lends itself both to a normalization theorem and to a theory of “meaning” for connectives . The present paper investigates cases where Jaskowski’s formulation seems better suited. These cases range from the phenomenology and epistemology of proof construction to the ways to incorporate novel logical connectives into the language. We close with a demonstration of this latter aspect by considering a Sheffer function for intuitionistic logic.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,867

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-06-25

Downloads
73 (#220,224)

6 months
11 (#340,569)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?