Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Natural Deduction for the Sheffer Stroke and Peirce’s Arrow (and any Other Truth-Functional Connective).Richard Zach - 2015 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 45 (2):183-197.
    Methods available for the axiomatization of arbitrary finite-valued logics can be applied to obtain sound and complete intelim rules for all truth-functional connectives of classical logic including the Sheffer stroke and Peirce’s arrow. The restriction to a single conclusion in standard systems of natural deduction requires the introduction of additional rules to make the resulting systems complete; these rules are nevertheless still simple and correspond straightforwardly to the classical absurdity rule. Omitting these rules results in systems for intuitionistic versions of (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Translations Between Gentzen–Prawitz and Jaśkowski–Fitch Natural Deduction Proofs.Shawn Standefer - 2019 - Studia Logica 107 (6):1103-1134.
    Two common forms of natural deduction proof systems are found in the Gentzen–Prawitz and Jaśkowski–Fitch systems. In this paper, I provide translations between proofs in these systems, pointing out the ways in which the translations highlight the structural rules implicit in the systems. These translations work for classical, intuitionistic, and minimal logic. I then provide translations for classical S4 proofs.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Translations between linear and tree natural deduction systems for relevant logics.Shawn Standefer - 2021 - Review of Symbolic Logic 14 (2):285 - 306.
    Anderson and Belnap presented indexed Fitch-style natural deduction systems for the relevant logics R, E, and T. This work was extended by Brady to cover a range of relevant logics. In this paper I present indexed tree natural deduction systems for the Anderson–Belnap–Brady systems and show how to translate proofs in one format into proofs in the other, which establishes the adequacy of the tree systems.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Calculus of Higher-Level Rules, Propositional Quantification, and the Foundational Approach to Proof-Theoretic Harmony.Peter Schroeder-Heister - 2014 - Studia Logica 102 (6):1185-1216.
    We present our calculus of higher-level rules, extended with propositional quantification within rules. This makes it possible to present general schemas for introduction and elimination rules for arbitrary propositional operators and to define what it means that introductions and eliminations are in harmony with each other. This definition does not presuppose any logical system, but is formulated in terms of rules themselves. We therefore speak of a foundational account of proof-theoretic harmony. With every set of introduction rules a canonical elimination (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  • Natural Deduction for Post’s Logics and their Duals.Yaroslav Petrukhin - 2018 - Logica Universalis 12 (1-2):83-100.
    In this paper, we introduce the notion of dual Post’s negation and an infinite class of Dual Post’s finitely-valued logics which differ from Post’s ones with respect to the definitions of negation and the sets of designated truth values. We present adequate natural deduction systems for all Post’s k-valued ) logics as well as for all Dual Post’s k-valued logics.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Automated Proof-searching for Strong Kleene Logic and its Binary Extensions via Correspondence Analysis.Yaroslav Petrukhin & Vasilyi Shangin - forthcoming - Logic and Logical Philosophy:1.
  • James W. Garson, Modal Logic for Philosophers. Second Edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013, pp. 506. ISBN: 978-1107609525 (paperback) $44.99. [REVIEW]Lloyd Humberstone - 2016 - Studia Logica 104 (2):365-379.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Normality, Non-contamination and Logical Depth in Classical Natural Deduction.Marcello D’Agostino, Dov Gabbay & Sanjay Modgil - 2020 - Studia Logica 108 (2):291-357.
    In this paper we provide a detailed proof-theoretical analysis of a natural deduction system for classical propositional logic that (i) represents classical proofs in a more natural way than standard Gentzen-style natural deduction, (ii) admits of a simple normalization procedure such that normal proofs enjoy the Weak Subformula Property, (iii) provides the means to prove a Non-contamination Property of normal proofs that is not satisfied by normal proofs in the Gentzen tradition and is useful for applications, especially in formal argumentation, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • The logical relation of consequence.Basil Evangelidis - 2020 - Humanities Bulletin 3 (2):77-90.
    The present endeavour aims at the clarification of the concept of the logical consequence. Initially we investigate the question: How was the concept of logical consequence discovered by the medieval philosophers? Which ancient philosophical foundations were necessary for the discovery of the logical relation of consequence and which explicit medieval contributions, such as the notion of the formality (formal validity), led to its discovery. Secondly we discuss which developments of modern philosophy effected the turn from the medieval concept of logical (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark