Abstract |
Because an organization member’s degree of cognitive moral development (CMD) can be expected to influence his or her decisions and behaviour, in this paper we investigate the idea that that employees might prefer to supervise, work with, or work under others of particular levels or stages of CMD. We surveyed undergraduate business students in order to identify typical CMD preferences for co-workers and test preliminary hypotheses concerning possible influences on those preferences. Majorities of subjects expressed preferences for conventional level work peers and subordinates but postconventional superiors, which could augur a lack of congruence between what subordinates typically desire of their superiors and how those superiors are likely to actually behave
|
Keywords | Business and Professional Ethics Conference Proceedings Social Science |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | 978-0-9763264-4-1 |
DOI | iabsproc20112210 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Assessing the Application of Cognitive Moral Development Theory to Business Ethics.John Fraedrich, Debbie M. Thorne & O. C. Ferrell - 1994 - Journal of Business Ethics 13 (10):829 - 838.
Ethical Work Climate as a Factor in the Development of Person-Organization Fit.Randi L. Sims & Thomas L. Keon - 1997 - Journal of Business Ethics 16 (11):1095-1105.
Moral Development in the Biographies of Skilled Industrial Workers.Wolfgang Lempert - 1994 - Journal of Moral Education 23 (4):451-468.
The Empirical Performance of Cognitive Moral Development in Predicting Behavioral Intent.R. Eric Reidenbach - 1996 - Business Ethics Quarterly 6 (4):493-516.
Second-Order Preferences and Instrumental Rationality.Donald W. Bruckner - 2011 - Acta Analytica 26 (4):367-385.
Collective Preferences, Obligations, and Rational Choice.Margaret Gilbert - 2001 - Economics and Philosophy 17 (1):109-119.
Rational Responsibility for Preferences and Moral Responsibility for Character Traits.Donald W. Bruckner - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Research 32:191-209.
Categorically Rational Preferences and the Structure of Morality.Duncan MacIntosh - 1998 - In Peter Danielson (ed.), Modeling Rationality, Morality and Evolution; Vancouver Studies in Cognitive Science, Volume 7. Oxford University Press.
Salience of Organizational Values as a Determinant of Value Projection and the Accuracy of Assessments of the Values of Superiors: Some Preliminary Evidence.Sefa Hayibor - 2005 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:22-25.
The Exercise of Moral Imagination in Stigmatized Work Groups.Esther Roca - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 96 (1):135 - 147.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2012-09-18
Total views
31 ( #370,717 of 2,518,471 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,186 of 2,518,471 )
2012-09-18
Total views
31 ( #370,717 of 2,518,471 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,186 of 2,518,471 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads