Equality versus priority: A misleading distinction

Economics and Philosophy 31 (2):229-238 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

People condemn inequalities for many reasons. For example, many who have no concern with distribution per se criticize inequalities in health care, because these inequalities lessen the benefits provided by the resources that are devoted to health care. Others who place no intrinsic value on distribution believe that a just society must show a special concern for those who are worst off. Some people, on the other hand, do place an intrinsic value on equality of distribution, regardless of its contribution to other goals. Derek Parfit and Larry Temkin call these people "egalitarians." I shall always employ quotation marks when referring to "egalitarians" in this special sense, because, as I shall argue, this terminology is misleading. One of its unhappy implications is that almost all egalitarians are not "egalitarians."

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Equality and proportionality.Christopher Knapp - 2007 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 37 (2):179-201.
Priority, Ethical Principle, and Allocation of Scarce Medical Resources. Di Wu - 2021 - Studies in Dialectics of Nature 11 (37):62-68.
Inequalities in Prospective Life Expectancy: Should Luck Egalitarians Care?Shlomi Segall - 2024 - In Ben Davies, Gabriel De Marco, Neil Levy & Julian Savulescu (eds.), Responsibility and Healthcare. Oxford University Press USA. pp. 305-326.
From relational equality to personal responsibility.Andreas T. Schmidt - 2022 - Philosophical Studies 179 (4):1373-1399.
Relational Egalitarianism and Democracy.Alexander Motchoulski - 2021 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 18 (6):620-649.
Genes and equality.Colin Farrelly - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (6):587-592.
An Egalitarian Argument against Reducing Deprivation.Julia Mosquera - 2017 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 20 (5):957-968.
Egalitarianism defended.Larry S. Temkin - 2003 - Ethics 113 (4):764-782.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-10

Downloads
169 (#23,139)

6 months
13 (#1,035,185)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daniel Hausman
University of Wisconsin, Madison

Citations of this work

Prioritarianism: A response to critics.Matthew D. Adler & Nils Holtug - 2019 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 18 (2):101-144.
Equality versus priority: A useful distinction.John Broome - 2015 - Economics and Philosophy 31 (2):219-228.
Equality versus priority: How relevant is the distinction?Marc Fleurbaey - 2015 - Economics and Philosophy 31 (2):203-217.
Economic Inequality and the Permissibility of Leveling Down.David Peña-Rangel - 2023 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 26 (5):803-832.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

What is the point of equality.Elizabeth Anderson - 1999 - Ethics 109 (2):287-337.
The Morality of Freedom.Joseph Raz - 1986 - Philosophy 63 (243):119-122.
Inequality Reexamined.John Roemer & Amartya Sen - 1994 - Philosophical Review 103 (3):554.

View all 11 references / Add more references