Is critical thinking across the curriculum a plausible goal?

Abstract

Critical thinking is considered an essential educational goal. As a result, many philosophers dreamed their departments would offer multiple sections of CT, hence justifying hiring additional staff. Unfortunately, this dream did not materialize. So, similar to a current theory about teaching writing, “critical thinking across the curriculum” has become a popular idea. While the idea has appeal and unquestionable merit, I will argue that the likelihood the skills necessary for effective CT will actually be taught is minimal.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Introduction to the special issue on using case studies to promote critical thinking.Kenneth T. Henson - 2005 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 24 (3):4-4.
Critical Thinking Across the Curriculum: The Wisdom CTAC Program.Robert Ennis - 2013 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 28 (2):25-45.
Re/Thinking Critical Thinking: The Seductions of Everyday Life.Kal Alston - 2001 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 20 (1):27-40.
Some Reflections on Critical Thinking and Mental Health.Tom Gilbert - 2003 - Teaching Philosophy 26 (4):333-349.
On Critical Thinking and Logic.Ming-hui Xiong - 2006 - Modern Philosophy 2:114-119.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-02

Downloads
34 (#459,882)

6 months
8 (#347,798)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas Samuel Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Otto Neurath.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Ian Hacking.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.David Bohm - 1964 - Philosophical Quarterly 14 (57):377-379.
The Uses of Argument.Stephen E. Toulmin - 1958 - Philosophy 34 (130):244-245.

View all 31 references / Add more references