- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Why corporeal substances keep popping up in Leibniz's later philosophy
British Journal for the History of Philosophy 6 (2):193 – 207 (1998)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Leibniz and the Natural World: Activity, Passivity and Corporeal Substances in Leibniz’s Philosophy. [REVIEW]Justin E. H. Smith - 2006 - The Leibniz Review 16:73-84.
Glenn A. Hartz: Leibniz’s Final System. Monads, Matter, and Animals. London − New York: Routledge 2006. An Essay Review.Massimo Mugnai - 2006 - Studia Leibnitiana 38:109-130.
Leibniz and the Natural World: Activity, Passivity and Corporeal Substances in Leibniz's Philosophy? Pauline Phemister. [REVIEW]Richard Arthur - 2007 - Philosophical Quarterly 57 (226):133-137.
Leibniz's de summa rerum and the panlogistic interpretation of the theory of simple substances.Andreas Blank - 2003 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 11 (2):261 – 269.
Incomplete Entities, Natural Non-separability, and Leibniz’s Response to François Lamy’s De la Conoissance de soi-même.Andreas Blank - 2003 - The Leibniz Review 13:1-17.
Leibniz and the Natural World: Activity, Passivity, and Corporeal Substances in Leibniz's Philosophy (review). [REVIEW]Michael Futch - 2007 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (1):162-163.
Mereological Nihilism and Simple Substance in Leibniz.Adam Harmer - 2022 - Res Philosophica 99 (1):39-65.
Leibniz’s theory of substance and his metaphysics of the Incarnation.Maria Rosa Antognazza - 2015 - In Paul Lodge & Tom Stoneham (eds.), Locke and Leibniz on Substance. New York: Routledge. pp. 231-252.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-02-01
Downloads
76 (#75,834)
6 months
13 (#1,035,185)
2009-02-01
Downloads
76 (#75,834)
6 months
13 (#1,035,185)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Leibniz on Hobbes’s Materialism.Stewart Duncan - 2010 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (1):11-18.
Leibniz on Sensation and the Limits of Reason.Walter Ott - 2016 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 33 (2):135-153.
On Two Theories of Substance in Leibniz: Critical Notice of Daniel Garber, Leibniz: Body, Substance, Monad.Samuel Levey - 2011 - Philosophical Review 120 (2):285-320.
Why Leibniz thinks Descartes was wrong and the Scholastics were right.Tyler Doggett - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 149 (1):1-18.
References found in this work
New Essays on Human Understanding.Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz - 1981 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Peter Remnant & Jonathan Bennett.
A critical exposition of the philosophy of Leibniz.Bertrand Russell - 1937 - Wolfeboro, N.H.: Longwood Press.
Philosophical papers and letters.Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz & Leroy E. Loemker - 1956 - Chicago,: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Leroy E. Loemker.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-kkm7k uwo