- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Why Leibniz thinks Descartes was wrong and the Scholastics were right
Philosophical Studies 149 (1):1-18 (2010)
Abstract
Leibniz believes that if there are corporeal substances, they have substantial forms, believes there are substantial forms, and believes there is a close connection between the first two claims. Why does he believe there is this close connection? This paper answers that question and draws out its bearing on the realism/idealism debate.Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
The historians of philosophy and late scholastics: The case of Descartes' theory of ideas.Predrag Milidrag - 2010 - Filozofija I Društvo 21 (1):187-207.
Divine simplicity and the eternal truths: Descartes and the scholastics.Andrew Pessin - 2010 - Philosophia 38 (1):69-105.
The historians of philosophy and late scholastics: The case of Descartes' theory of ideas.Milidrag Predrag - 2010 - Filozofija I Društvo 21 (1):187-207.
“He who lapse last lapse best”: Plantinga on leibniz’s lapse.Jonathan L. Kvanvig - 1994 - Southwest Philosophy Review 10 (1):137-146.
Leibniz on Cartesian Omnipotence and Contingency.David Werther - 1995 - Religious Studies 31 (1):23 - 36.
Leibniz Critique de Descartes. [REVIEW]John van Heijenoort - 1961 - Journal of Philosophy 58 (2):53-55.
Descartes, Doubt, and Dualism.Michael Wreen - 2005 - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 8 (1):83-98.
Science et métaphysique dans Descartes et Leibniz.Michel Fichant - 1998 - Paris: Presses Universitaires de France - PUF.
Les enjeux de la publication en France des papiers de Leibniz sur Spinoza.P. -F. Moreau - 1988 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 93 (2):215 - 222.
Descartes and the Scholastics Briefly Revisited.Norman J. Wells - 1961 - New Scholasticism 35 (2):172-190.
Ariew, Roger. Descartes and the Last Scholastics. [REVIEW]Brandon Look - 2000 - Review of Metaphysics 54 (1):128-129.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-03-31
Downloads
133 (#134,798)
6 months
8 (#342,364)
2010-03-31
Downloads
133 (#134,798)
6 months
8 (#342,364)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
The Logic of Leibniz’s Borrowed Reality Argument.Stephen Puryear - 2020 - Philosophical Quarterly 70 (279):350-370.
References found in this work
Leibniz: determinist, theist, idealist.Adams Robert Merrihew - 1994 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Leibniz & Arnauld: A Commentary on Their Correspondence.R. C. Sleigh - 1990 - Yale University Press.
Ideas and Mechanism: Essays on Early Modern Philosophy.Margaret Dauler Wilson - 1999 - Princeton University Press.
The light of the soul: theories of ideas in Leibniz, Malebranche, and Descartes.Nicholas Jolley - 1990 - New York: Oxford University Press.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-5tf24 uwo