Response to Comments

Review of Metaphysics 9 (1):125 - 128 (1955)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

2. Mr. Raab is right that some elucidation is needed for thesis 1. Following his suggestion, I would say that an assumption is a proposition which we believe but can't prove. But, what he calls "assumptions which aren't believed" I subsume under "supposition." Suppositions and assumptions can be well-confirmed hypotheses. To entertain is to consider, to examine, or to test.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,846

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Justice as inherent rights: A response to my commentators.Nicholas Wolterstorff - 2009 - Journal of Religious Ethics 37 (2):261-279.
Response to Comments.Konstantin Kolenda - 1956 - Review of Metaphysics 10 (1):118 - 121.
Response to Comments.Donald Walhout - 1956 - Review of Metaphysics 9 (4):652 - 655.
Response to Comments.Newton P. Stallknecht - 1956 - Review of Metaphysics 9 (3):481 - 484.
Response to Comments.Paul Weiss - 1955 - Review of Metaphysics 8 (4):682 - 684.
Response to Comments.Richard Taylor - 1954 - Review of Metaphysics 7 (4):689 - 693.
A Response to Comments.Andrew P. Ushenko - 1953 - Review of Metaphysics 6 (3):483 - 485.
Response to Comments.Francis V. Raab - 1952 - Review of Metaphysics 6 (1):130 - 131.
Response to Comments.Carl G. Hempel - 1952 - Review of Metaphysics 5 (4):628 - 629.
Response to Comments.James F. Anderson - 1952 - Review of Metaphysics 5 (3):469 - 472.
Comments on Girardot's response.Robert C. Neville - 1986 - Philosophy East and West 36 (3):271-273.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
17 (#867,741)

6 months
13 (#194,369)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references