122 found
Order:
Disambiguations
David Ingram [122]David B. Ingram [5]David Bruce Ingram [1]
See also
David Ingram
Loyola University, Chicago
David Ingram
University of York
  1. Nefarious Presentism.Jonathan Tallant & David Ingram - 2015 - Philosophical Quarterly 65 (260):355-371.
    Presentists, who believe that only present objects exist, face a problem concerning truths about the past. Presentists should (but cannot) locate truth-makers for truths about the past. What can presentists say in response? We identify two rival factions ‘upstanding’ and ‘nefarious’ presentists. Upstanding presentists aim to meet the challenge, positing presently existing truth-makers for truths about the past; nefarious presentists aim to shirk their responsibilities, using the language of truth-maker theory but without paying any ontological price. We argue that presentists (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   38 citations  
  2. The Virtues of Thisness Presentism.David Ingram - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (11):2867-2888.
    Presentists believe that only present things exist. But opponents insist this view has unacceptable implications: if only present things exist, we can’t express singular propositions about the past, since the obvious propositional constituents don’t exist, nor can we account for temporal passage, or the openness of the future. According to such opponents, and in spite of the apparent ‘common sense’ status of the view, presentism should be rejected on the basis of these unacceptable implications. In this paper, I present and (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   19 citations  
  3.  95
    Thisness Presentism: An Essay on Time, Truth, and Ontology.David Ingram - 2019 - Oxford, UK: Routledge.
    Thisness Presentism outlines and defends a novel version of presentism, the view that only present entities exist and what is present really changes. Presentism is a view of time that captures a real and objective difference between what is past, present, and future, and which offers a model of reality that is dynamic and mutable, rather than static and immutable. The book advances a new defence of presentism by developing a novel ontology of thisness, combining insights about the nature of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  4. Thisnesses, Propositions, and Truth.David Ingram - 2018 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 99 (3):442-463.
    Presentists, who believe that only present objects exist, should accept a thisness ontology, since it can do considerable work in defence of presentism. In this paper, I propose a version of presentism that involves thisnesses of past and present entities and I argue this view solves important problems facing standard versions of presentism.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  5.  18
    Presentism.David Ingram & Jonathan Tallant - 2018 - The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Presentism is the view that only present things exist (Hinchliff 1996: 123; Crisp 2004: 15; Markosian 2004: 47–48). So understood, presentism is an ontological doctrine; it’s a view about what exists (what there is), absolutely and unrestrictedly. The view is the subject of extensive discussion in the literature, with much of it focused on the problems that presentism allegedly faces. Thus, much of the literature that frames the development of presentism has grown up either in formulating objections to the view (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  6. Time for Distribution?Jonathan Tallant & David Ingram - 2012 - Analysis 72 (2):264-270.
    Presentists face a familiar problem. If only present objects exist, then what 'makes true' our true claims about the past? According to Ross Cameron, the 'truth-makers' for past and future tensed propositions are presently instantiated Temporal Distributional Properties. We present an argument against Cameron's view. There are two ways that we might understand the term 'distribute' as it appears. On one reading, the resulting properties are not up to the task of playing the truth-maker role; on the other, the properties (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  7. Presentism and Distributional Properties.Jonathan Tallant & David Ingram - 2012 - In Karen Bennett & Dean Zimmerman (eds.), Oxford Studies in Metaphysics, Vol. 7. Oxford University Press. pp. 305-314.
    Ross Cameron proposes to reconcile presentism and truth-maker theory by invoking temporal distributional properties, instantiated by present entities, as the truth-makers for truths about the past. This chapter argues that Cameron's proposal fails because objects can change which temporal distributional properties they instantiate and this entails that the truth-values of truths about the past can change in an objectionable way.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  8.  17
    Habermas: Introduction and Analysis.David Ingram (ed.) - 2010 - Cornell University Press.
    "This is a marvelous resource for anyone interested in better understanding the difficult and voluminous work of jurgen Habermas.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  9.  59
    A Defence of Lucretian Presentism.Jonathan Tallant & David Ingram - 2020 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 98 (4):675-690.
    In this paper, we defend Lucretian Presentism. Although the view faces many objections and has proven unpopular with presentists, we rehabilitate Lucretianism and argue that none of the objections stick.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  10. World Crisis and Underdevelopment: A Critical Theory of Poverty, Agency, and Coercion.David Ingram - 2017 - Cambridge University Press.
    World Crisis and Underdevelopment examines the impact of poverty and other global crises in generating forms of structural coercion that cause agential and societal underdevelopment. It draws from discourse ethics and recognition theory in criticizing injustices and pathologies associated with underdevelopment. Its scope is comprehensive, encompassing discussions about development science, philosophical anthropology, global migration, global capitalism and economic markets, human rights, international legal institutions, democratic politics and legitimation, world religions and secularization, and moral philosophy in its many varieties.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  11.  13
    When Microcredit Doesn’T Empower Poor Women: Recognition Theory’s Contribution to the Debate Over Adaptive Preferences.David Ingram - 2020 - In Gottfried Schweiger (ed.), Poverty, Inequality and the Critical Theory of Recognition.
    This essay proposes recognition theory as a preferred approach to explaining poor women’s puzzling preference for patriarchal subordination even after they have accessed an ostensibly empowering asset: microfinance. Neither the standard account of adaptive preference offered by Martha Nussbaum nor the competing account of constrained rational choice offered by Harriet Baber satisfactorily explains an important variation of what Serene Khader, in discussing microfinance, dubs the self-subordination social recognition paradox. The variation in question involves women who, refusing to reject the combined (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  12.  6
    [Book Review] Habermas and the Dialectic of Reason. [REVIEW]David Ingram - 1992 - Social Theory and Practice 18 (3):81-111.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  13. Habermas and the Dialectic of Reason.David Ingram - 1987 - Yale University Press.
    In his magnum opus, Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, the distinguished philosopher Jurgen Habermas presented his ideas as a whole, providing the first major defense of his philosophy. David Ingram here summarizes the themes of Habermas's masterwork, placing them in the context of the philosopher's other work, relating them to poststructuralism, hermeneutics, and Neo-Aristotelianism, and surveying what other critics have said about Habermas. "Ingram's exposition of Habermas is impressive for its erudition and its faithful adherence to the major contours of Habermas's (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  14.  24
    Reason, History, and Politics: The Communitarian Grounds of Legitimation in the Modern Age.David Ingram - 1995 - State University of New York Press.
    The author shows that conceptions of rationality in current theories of science and law can account for neither the legitimacy of paradigm shifts nor the communitarian integrity internal to paradigms generally. He proposes an alternative conception of rationality that does.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  15.  45
    Between Political Liberalism and Postnational Cosmopolitanism.David Ingram - 2003 - Political Theory 31 (3):359-391.
    It is well known that Rawls and Habermas propose different strategies for justifying and classifying human rights. The author argues that neither approach satisfies what he regards as threshold conditions of determinacy, rank ordering, and completeness that any enforceable system of human rights must possess. A related concern is that neither develops an adequate account of group rights, which the author argues fulfills subsidiary conditions for realizing human rights under specific conditions. This latter defect is especially serious in light of (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  16. Habermas and the Dialectic of Reason.David Ingram - 1990 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 52 (3):552-554.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  17.  51
    The Retreat of the Political in the Modern Age: Jean-Luc Nancy on Totalitarianism and Community.David Ingram - 1988 - Research in Phenomenology 18 (1):93-124.
  18.  30
    Critical Theory and Philosophy.David Ingram - 1990 - Paragon House.
    Critical Theory and Philosophy illuminates one of the most complex and influential philosophical movements of this century. After tracking Critical Theory to its source in the works of Kant, Hegel, Marx, and Weber, David Ingram examines the four major figures of the Frankfurt School: Theodor Adorno, Max Horkheimer, Herbert Marcuse, and Jurgen Habermas. The logical structure of this text guides both novice and veteran students through specific social and political concerns toward a gradual understanding of the philosophy of critical evaluation. (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  19.  72
    The Rotten Core of Presentism.Jonathan Tallant & David Ingram - 2021 - Synthese 199 (1-2):3969-3991.
    Recently, some have attempted to reformulate debates in first-order metaphysics, particularly in the metaphysics of time and modality, for reasons due to Williamson. In this paper, we focus on the ways in which the likes of Cameron, Correia and Rosenkranz, Deasy, Ingram, Tallant, Viebahn, inter alia, have initiated and responded to attempts to capture the core of presentism using a formal, logical machinery. We argue that such attempts are doomed to fail because there is no theoretical core to presentism. There (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20.  6
    Between Political Liberalism and Postnational Cosmopolitanism: Toward an Alternative Theory of Human Rights.David Ingram - 2003 - Philosophy Today 31 (3):359-391.
    It is well known that Rawls and Habermas propose different strategies for justifying and classifying human rights. The author argues that neither approach satisfies what he regards as threshold conditions of determinacy, rank ordering, and completeness that any enforceable system of human rights must possess. A related concern is that neither develops an adequate account of group rights, which the author argues fulfills subsidiary conditions for realizing human rights under specific conditions. This latter defect is especially serious in light of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  21.  42
    Foucault and Habermas.David Ingram - 2006 - In Gary Gutting (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Foucault. Cambridge University Press.
    The article is a comprehensive comparison of Foucault and Habermas which focuses on their distinctive styles of critical theory. The article maintains that Foucault's virtue ethical understanding of aesthetic self-realization as a form of resistance to normalizing practices provides counterpoint to Habermas's more juridical approach to institutional justice and the critique of ideology. The article contains an extensive discussion of their respective treatments of speech action, both strategic and communicative, and concludes by addressing Foucault's understanding of parrhesia as a non-discursive (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  22.  27
    The Limits and Possibilities of Communicative Ethics for Democratic Theory.David Ingram - 1993 - Political Theory 21 (2):294-321.
  23. Rights, Democracy, and Fulfillment in the Era of Identity Politics: Principled Compromises in a Compromised World.David Ingram - 2004 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    Rights, Democracy, and Fulfillment in the Era of Identity Politics develops a critical theory of human rights and global democracy. Ingram both develops a theory of rights and applies it to a range of concrete and timely issues, such as the persistence of racism in contemporary American society; the emergence of so-called 'whiteness theory;' the failure of identity politics; the tensions between emphases on antidiscrimination and affirmative action in the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990; the great unresolved issues of (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  24.  24
    The Postmodern Kantianism of Arendt and Lyotard.David Ingram - 1988 - Review of Metaphysics 42 (1):51 - 77.
    THE PAST DECADE has witnessed an extraordinary resurgence of interest in Kant's writings on aesthetics, politics, and history. On the Continent much of this interest has centered on the debate between modernism and postmodernism. Both sides of the debate are in agreement that Kant's differentiation of cognitive, practical, and aesthetic domains of rationality anticipated the fragmentation of modern society into competing if not, as Weber assumed, opposed lifestyles, activities, and value spheres, and that this has generated a crisis of judgment. (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  25.  58
    Platonism, Alienation, and Negativity.David Ingram - 2016 - Erkenntnis 81 (6):1273-1285.
    A platonic theory of possibility states that truths about what’s possible are determined by facts about properties not being instantiated. Recently, Matthew Tugby has argued in favour of this sort of theory, arguing that adopting a platonic theory of possibility allows us to solve a paradox concerning alien properties: properties that might have been instantiated, but aren’t actually. In this paper, I raise a worry for Tugby’s proposal—that it commits us to negative facts playing an important truth-making role—and offer a (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  26.  14
    Exceptional Justice? A Discourse Ethical Contribution to the Immigrant Question.David Ingram - 2009 - Critical Horizons 10 (1):1-30.
    I argue that the exception must be a legitimate possibility within law as a revolutionary project, in much the same way that civil disobedience is. In this sense, the exception is not outside law if by "law" we mean not positive law as defined by extant legal documents but law as a living tradition consisting of both abstract norms and a concrete historical understanding of them. So construed, the exception is what can be exemplary - a law unto itself that (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  27.  7
    What an Ethics of Discourse and Recognition Can Contribute to a Critical Theory of Refugee Claim Adjudication.David Ingram - 2021 - In Gottfried Schweiger (ed.), Migration, Recognition and Critical Theory.
    Thanks to Axel Honneth, recognition theory has become a prominent fixture of critical social theory. In recent years, he has deployed his recognition theory in diagnosing pathologies and injustices that afflict institutional practices. Some of these institutional practices revolve around specifically juridical institutions, such as human rights and democratic citizenship, that directly impact the lives of the most desperate migrants. Hence it is worthwhile asking what recognition theory can add to a critical theory of migration. In this paper, I argue (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  28.  72
    Of Sweatshops and Subsistence: Habermas on Human Rights.David Ingram - 2009 - Ethics and Global Politics 2 (3).
    In this paper I argue that the discourse theoretic account of human rights defended by Jürgen Habermas contains a fruitful tension that is obscured by its dominant tendency to identify rights with legal claims. This weakness in Habermas’s account becomes manifest when we examine how sweatshops diminish the secure enjoyment of subsistence, which Habermas himself (in recognition of the UDHR) recognizes as a human right. Discourse theories of human rights are unique in tying the legitimacy of human rights to democratic (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  29.  69
    Dworkin, Habermas, and the Cls Movement on Moral Criticism in Law.David Ingram - 1990 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 16 (4):237-268.
    CLS advocates renew Marx's critique of liberalism by impugning the rationality of formal rights. Habermas and Dworkin argue against this view, while showing how liberal polity might permit reasonable conflicts between competing principles of right. Their models of legitimate legislation and adjudication, however, presuppose criteria of rationality whose appeal to truth ignores the manner in which law is--and sometimes ought to be--compromised. Hence a weaker version of the CLS critique may be applicable after all. I begin by discussing Weber's exclusion (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  30.  9
    Blumenberg and the Philosophical Grounds of Historiography.David Ingram - 1990 - History and Theory 29 (1):1-15.
    Blumenberg's rejection of Karl Lowith's secularization thesis, as presented in Lowith's The Legitimacy of the Modern Age, and Blumenberg's defense of an alternative theory of functional reoccupations raises questions about the kind of progress he finds operant in historiography and historical understanding. These questions are best addressed within the framework of his recent Work on Myth, which defines the legitimacy of an age or myth in terms of progressive adaptability rather than autonomy. Neither this work nor the study on legitimacy, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  31.  28
    Antidiscrimination, Welfare, and Democracy: Toward a Discourse-Ethical Understanding of Disability Law.David Ingram - 2006 - Social Theory and Practice 32 (2):213-248.
  32. Critical Theory to Structuralism: Philosophy, Politics and the Human Sciences.David Ingram - 2013 - Routledge.
    Philosophy in the middle of the 20th Century, between 1920 and 1968, responded to the cataclysmic events of the time. Thinkers on the Right turned to authoritarian forms of nationalism in search of stable forms of collective identity, will, and purpose. Thinkers on the Left promoted egalitarian forms of humanism under the banner of international communism. Others saw these opposed tendencies as converging in the extinction of the individual and sought to retrieve the ideals of the Enlightenment in ways that (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  33.  33
    Habermas and the Unfinished Project of Democracy.David Ingram - 2005 - Human Studies 28 (2):223-225.
    This collection of ten essays offers the first systematic assessment of The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, Jurgen Habermas's masterful defense of the rational potential of the modern age. An opening essay by Maurizio Passerin d'Entreves orients the debate between Habermas and the postmodernists by identifying two different senses of responsibility. Habermas's own essay discusses the themes of his book in the context of a critical engagement with neoconservative cultural and political trends. The main body of essays is divided into two (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  34.  24
    The Political.David Ingram (ed.) - 2002 - Wiley-Blackwell.
    _The Political_ is a collection of readings by the most important political philosophers representing the six major schools of Continental philosophy: Phenomenology, Existentialism, Critical Theory, Poststructuralism, Postmodernism, and Postcolonialism.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  35.  14
    The Public Sphere as Site of Emancipation and Enlightenment: A Discourse Theoretic Critique of Digital Communication.David Ingram & Asaf Bar-Tura - unknown
    Habermas claims that an inclusive public sphere is the only deliberative forum for generating public opinion that satisfies the epistemic and normative conditions underlying legitimate decision-making. He adds that digital technologies and other mass media need not undermine – but can extend – rational deliberation when properly instituted. This paper draws from social epistemology and technology studies to demonstrate the epistemic and normative limitations of this extension. We argue that current online communication structures fall short of satisfying the required epistemic (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  36.  4
    Hermeneutics and Truth.David Ingram - 1984 - Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 15 (1):62-78.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  37. Green Screen: Environmentalism and Hollywood Cinema.David Ingram - 2005 - Environmental Values 14 (4):539-543.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  38.  4
    Human Rights, Legalism, and the Parodox of Pluralism: Some Comments on Benhabib’s Exile, Statelessness and Migration.David Ingram - 2021 - Arendt Studies 5:37-44.
    This article examines the theoretical pathways connecting Benhabib’s thoughts on ethical normativity, human rights, legality, democracy, liberalism, pluralism, and the tragedy of the political. It endorses Benhabib’s dialectical treatment of these paradoxical political tropes but notes a possible unresolved tension in her discussion of the ambiguous moral and legal nature of human rights. I propose a pluralist approach to the moral grounding of legal human rights that might be at odds with Benhabib’s approach.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  39.  97
    Truth and Dependence.Jonathan Tallant & David Ingram - 2017 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 4:955-980.
    Truths depend upon what there is. So say many. A significant subset of that group say more; they say that the best way—perhaps the only way—to make sense of the claim that truth depends upon what there is, is to adopt a form of truth-maker theory. Truth-maker theorists claim that truths require ground; what’s true must depend upon what there is. Typically, truth-maker theory isn’t seen as a theory about the nature of truth. Rather, it’s seen as a theory about (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  40. The Copernican Revolution Revisited: Paradigm, Metaphor and Incommensurability in the History of Science- Blumenberg's Response to Kuhn and Davidson.David Ingram - 1993 - History of the Human Sciences 6 (4):11-35.
  41.  59
    Presentism and the Spans of Time.Jonathan Tallant & David Ingram - 2020 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 101 (1):200-214.
    Presentists, who believe that only present entities exist, face a problem of how to analyse tensed plural quantification. The idea, in broad outline, is that presentists can't employ the usual method for analysing tensed singular quantification, using primitive ‘slice’ tense operators, to analyse plurals. One option is to introduce a new theoretical primitive: a ‘span’‐operator. But there are reasons to worry about this option. For one, we might agree with Lewis that span‐operators are ill‐behaved or introduce unpalatable complexity. For another, (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  42.  5
    Recognition and Positive Freedom.David Ingram - 2020 - In John Christman (ed.), Positive Freedom Past, Present, and Future.
    A number of well-known Hegel-inspired theorists have recently defended a distinctive type of social freedom that, while bearing some resemblance to Isaiah Berlin’s famous description of positive freedom, takes its bearings from a theory of social recognition rather than a theory of moral self-determination. Berlin himself argued that recognition-based theories of freedom are really not about freedom at all but about solidarity, More strongly, he argued that recognition-based theories of freedom, like most accounts of solidarity, oppose what Kant originally understood (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  43.  5
    How Secular Should Democracy Be? A Cross-Disciplinary Study of Catholicism and Islam in Promoting Public Reason.David Ingram - unknown
    I argue that the same factors that motivated Catholicism to champion liberal democracy are the same that motivate 21st Century Islam to do the same. I defend this claim by linking political liberalism to democratic secularism. Distinguishing institutional, political, and epistemic dimensions of democratic secularism, I show that moderate forms of political and epistemic secularism are most conducive to fostering the kind of public reasoning essential to democratic legitimacy. This demonstration draws upon the ambivalent impact of Indonesia’s Islamic parties in (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  44.  73
    Jürgen Habermas and Hans-Georg Gadamer.David Ingram - 2003 - In Robert C. Solomon & David L. Sherman (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to Continental Philosophy. Blackwell. pp. 219--242.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  45. Contractualism, Democracy, and Social Law: Basic Antinomies in Liberal Thought.David Ingram - 1991 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 17 (4):265-296.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  46.  85
    Review Essay: Under Consideration: Alessandro Ferrara's The Force of the Example: Explorations in the Paradigm of Judgment, Columbia University Press, 2008, 235 Pp. [REVIEW]David Ingram - 2010 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 36 (8):981-984.
    (No abstract is available for this citation).
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  47.  71
    Book Symposium on Andrew Feenberg’s Between Reason and Experience: Essays in Technology and Modernity: Cambridge: MIT Press, 2010.Inmaculada de Melo-Martín, David B. Ingram, Sally Wyatt, Yoko Arisaka & Andrew Feenberg - 2011 - Philosophy and Technology 24 (2):203-226.
    Book Symposium on Andrew Feenberg’s Between Reason and Experience: Essays in Technology and Modernity Content Type Journal Article Pages 203-226 DOI 10.1007/s13347-011-0017-8 Authors Inmaculada de Melo-Martín, Division of Medical Ethics, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, USA David B. Ingram, Loyola University Chicago, 6525 North Sheridan Road, Chicago, IL 60626, USA Sally Wyatt, e-Humanities Group, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW) & Maastricht University, Cruquiusweg 31, 1019 AT Amsterdam, The Netherlands Yoko Arisaka, Forschungsinstitut für Philosophie Hannover, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48.  69
    Reviews. [REVIEW]S. M. Easton, F. Seddon, Robert B. Louden, David Ingram, Michael Howard, Philip Moran, N. G. O. Pereira & Thomas A. Shipka - 1984 - Studies in East European Thought 28 (2):219-229.
  49.  74
    Rights and Privileges: Marx and the Jewish Question.David B. Ingram - 1988 - Studies in East European Thought 35 (2):125-145.
  50.  11
    Introduction.David Ingram - 2019 - Ethics and Global Politics 12 (4):1-10.
1 — 50 / 122