More and Better Justice

Royal Institute of Philosophy Lecture Series 23:75-96 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The principle that people's lives and fundamental interests are of equal value and that they must therefore be given equal weight has immense intellectual appeal and intuitive force. It is often enough to discredit a theory or proposal simply to show that it violates this principle. When measures are said to be discriminatory or unfair it is this principle which is in play. Recent philosophers of widely differing schools and outlooks give versions of this principle a central role in their theories.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Theorizing Justice: Critical Insights and Future Directions.Krushil Watene & Jay Drydyk (eds.) - 2016 - New York: Rowman & Littlefield International.
So what is justice anyway?Chelsea Luthringer - 2000 - New York: Rosen Pub. Group.
Justice publique et justice privée.Daniel Cohen - 1997 - Archives de Philosophie du Droit 41:149-162.
Social justice and legal justice.Wojciech Sadurski - 1984 - Law and Philosophy 3 (3):329 - 354.
Justice as a virtue: An analysis of Aristotle’s virtue of justice.Huang Xianzhong - 2007 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (2):265-279.
Property and Justice.J. W. Harris - 2002 - Oxford University Press.
Confucius, Rawls, and the sense of justice.Erin M. Cline - 2013 - New York: Fordham University Press.
L'oeil de Caïn: essai sur la justice.Martin Blais - 1994 - [Saint-Laurent, Québec] : Fides.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-23

Downloads
20 (#767,589)

6 months
6 (#520,934)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?