International public health law: not so much WHO as why, and not enough WHO and why not? [Book Review]

Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 12 (3):245-255 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

To state the obvious, “health matters”, but health (or its equitable enjoyment) is neither simple nor easy. Public health in particular, which encompasses a broad collection of complex and multidisciplinary activities which are critical to the wellbeing and security of individuals, populations and nations, is a difficult milieu to master effectively. In fact, despite the vital importance of public health, there is a relative dearth of ethico-legal norms tailored for, and directed at, the public health sector, particularly at the international level. This is a state of affairs which is no longer tenable in the global environment. This article argues that public health promotion is a moral duty, and that international actors are key stakeholders upon whom this duty falls. In particular, the World Health Organization bears a heavy responsibility in this regard. The article claims that better health can and must be better promoted through a more robust interpretation of the WHO’s role, arguing that neither the WHO nor international law have yet played their necessary part in promoting health for all

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Building Public Health Law Capacity at the Local Level.Diane E. Hoffmann & Virginia Rowthorn - 2008 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (s3):6-28.
Global Health Law and the Climate Crisis: An Unfulfilled Opportunity.Lance Gable - 2023 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 51 (3):694-697.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
42 (#375,800)

6 months
12 (#313,206)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?