Definable properties of the computably enumerable sets

Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 94 (1-3):97-125 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Post in 1944 began studying properties of a computably enumerable set A such as simple, h-simple, and hh-simple, with the intent of finding a property guaranteeing incompleteness of A . From the observations of Post and Myhill , attention focused by the 1950s on properties definable in the inclusion ordering of c.e. subsets of ω, namely E = . In the 1950s and 1960s Tennenbaum, Martin, Yates, Sacks, Lachlan, Shoenfield and others produced a number of elegant results relating ∄-definable properties of A , like maximal, hh-simple, atomless, to the information content of A . Harrington and Soare gave an answer to Post's program for definable properties by producing an ∄-definable property Q which guarantees that A is incomplete and noncomputable, but developed a new Δ 3 0 -automorphism method to prove certain other properties are not ∄-definable. In this paper we introduce new ∄-definable properties relating the ∄-structure of A to deg, which answer some open questions. In contrast to Q we exhibit here an ∄-definable property T which allows such a rapid flow of elements into A that A must be complete even though A may possess many other properties such as being promptly simple. We also present a related property NL which has a slower flow but fast enough to guarantee that A is not low, even though A may possess virtually all other related lowness properties and A may simultaneously be promptly simple

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Differences of Computably Enumerable Sets.A. Nies & S. Lempp - 2000 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 46 (4):555-562.
On orbits, of prompt and low computably enumerable sets.Kevin Wald - 2002 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 67 (2):649-678.
An Interval of Computably Enumerable Isolating Degrees.Matthew C. Salts - 1999 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 45 (1):59-72.
Dynamic properties of computably enumerable sets.Robert I. Soare - 1996 - In S. B. Cooper, T. A. Slaman & S. S. Wainer (eds.), Computability, Enumerability, Unsolvability: Directions in Recursion Theory. Cambridge University Press. pp. 224--105.
On a Conjecture of Kleene and Post.S. Barry Cooper - 2001 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 47 (1):3-34.
On the orbits of hyperhypersimple sets.Wolfgang Maass - 1984 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 49 (1):51-62.
Computability Results Used in Differential Geometry.Barbara F. Csima & Robert I. Soare - 2006 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 71 (4):1394 - 1410.
The computably enumerable degrees are locally non-cappable.Matthew B. Giorgi - 2004 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 43 (1):121-139.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-16

Downloads
51 (#310,975)

6 months
7 (#421,763)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Duality, non-standard elements, and dynamic properties of r.e. sets.V. Yu Shavrukov - 2016 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 167 (10):939-981.
Definable incompleteness and Friedberg splittings.Russell Miller - 2002 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 67 (2):679-696.
Orbits of computably enumerable sets: low sets can avoid an upper cone.Russell Miller - 2002 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 118 (1-2):61-85.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Computability and recursion.Robert I. Soare - 1996 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 2 (3):284-321.
Automorphisms of the lattice of recursively enumerable sets.Peter Cholak - 1995 - Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
Recursively enumerable generic sets.Wolfgang Maass - 1982 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 47 (4):809-823.

View all 15 references / Add more references