Computational Hermeneutics

Abstract

We must distinguish between what can be described or interpreted as X and what really is X. Otherwise we are just doing hermeneutics. It won't do simply to declare that the thermostat turns on the furnace because it feels cold or that the chess-playing computer program makes a move because it thinks it should get its queen out early. In what does real feeling and thinking consist?

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Against computational hermeneutics.Stevan Harnad - 1990 - Social Epistemology 4:167-172.
Must Nietzsche be Incorporated into Hermeneutics? Some Reasons for a Little Resistance.Jean Grondin - 2010 - Iris. European Journal of Philosophy and Public Debate 2 (3):105-122.
Hermeneutics: A protreptic.Gregory R. Johnson - 1990 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 4 (1-2):173-211.
Hermeneutics: an introduction to interpretive theory.Stanley E. Porter - 2011 - Grand Rapids, Mich.: William B. Eerdmans. Edited by Jason Robinson.
Martin Heidegger and the hermeneutics of Torah: a strange affinity.Allen Michael Scult - 2007 - New York: Hunter College of the City University of New York.
Beyond interpretation: the meaning of hermeneutics for philosophy.Gianni Vattimo - 1997 - Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-22

Downloads
45 (#347,159)

6 months
3 (#992,575)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stevan Harnad
McGill University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references