Competing Claims and the Separateness of Persons

Philosophical Papers 51 (1):89-113 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I argue that the use of the separateness of persons in the debate between the priority view and the competing claims view is deeply flawed. In making the case, I argue for three points. First, that...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,045

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

One-by-one: moral theory for separate persons.Bastian Steuwer - 2020 - Dissertation, London School of Economics
Egalitarianism and the Separateness of Persons.Dennis McKerlie - 1988 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 18 (2):205 - 225.
Rights, Duties and the Separateness of Persons.Timothy Hinton - 2009 - Philosophical Papers 38 (1):73-91.
Sufficientarianism and the Separateness of Persons.Shlomi Segall - 2019 - Philosophical Quarterly 69 (274):142-155.
The Separateness of Persons.Win-Chiat Lee - 1986 - Dissertation, Princeton University
Rights and Persons.Pierfrancesco Biasetti - 2018 - In Andrea Altobrando, Takuya Niikawa & Richard Stone (eds.), The Realizations of the Self. Cham: Palgrave MacMillan. pp. 217-232.
Equality or priority about competing claims?Shlomi Segall - 2022 - Economics and Philosophy 38 (2):242-265.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-02-24

Downloads
31 (#504,784)

6 months
8 (#505,344)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jamie Hardy
University of Utah

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Famine, affluence, and morality.Peter Singer - 1972 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (3):229-243.
Mortal Questions.Thomas Nagel - 1983 - Religious Studies 19 (1):96-99.
Equality or Priority?Derek Parfit - 2001 - In John Harris (ed.), Bioethics. Oxford University Press. pp. 81-125.

View all 18 references / Add more references