American Hegemony, the Peaceful Development of China and China-US Relations

Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 3:19-28 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Post-Cold War international system is characterized by two prominent U.S. hegemony and a unipolar world dominated China's rapid development. China and the U.S. in the current international system there is both structurally strategic contradiction, but because of the limitations of U.S. hegemony and its process of rapid development in China in the domestic difficulties faced, particularly strong in China's foreign economic dependence , but also makes the structural contradiction between the two countries can not control will not evolve into large-scale conflict. As the Sino-US relations and cooperation between the co-existence of this contradiction the complex nature of bilateral relations in recent years, showing a very obvious, cyclical ups and downs of the prominent features. The near term, the two countries in their respective core fundamental conflict of interest does not exist; the long run, the two countries to avoid conflict, to strengthen cooperation in line with their national interests; the same time, international political changes in the nature of authority also will change the international system will inevitably lead to changes in the distribution of power among the major powers of the traditional understanding of conflict; In addition, diplomacy can play an important role in promoting peaceful means of their respective national interests between the two countries. The international system in the post-Cold War world is characterized by the unipolarity dominated by American hegemony and the rapid development of China. While structurally there is strategic contradiction between China and the United States in the international system, the interdependence between them also has increased continually. This characteristic has been marked by the ups and downs in their bilateral relations periodically. The author argues that there exists no critical conflicts of vital interests between the two states in the short term; in the long ran, it is strategically important and in their interests to avoid confrontation and strengthen cooperation; meanwhile, the changes of the nature of power will modify the traditional view of power in the sor1d polities; in addition, diplomacy can also play a significant role

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Factors of Sixty-Year Sino-US Relations and Its Implications.Rui-Zhuang Zhang & Xiao-Ding Chen - 2009 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 4:1-9.
Sino-Japanese Relations from Hostility to Strategic Reciprocity.Zhi-Yong Song - 2009 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 4:20-28.
China's Environmental and Development Issues in Transition.Wang Yi - 2006 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 73 (1):277-291.
On Improving China's Ascertainment System of Foreign Law.Jian Sun - 2008 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 6:112-120.
On the Three Stratifications of the Soft Power.Tie-Ying Gong - 2007 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 5:39-45.
China, Economic Regionalism, and East Asian Integration.Wang Yuzhu - 2011 - Japanese Journal of Political Science 12 (2):195-212.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-02

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references