Teaching Goodness

Teaching Philosophy 29 (2):81-92 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper investigates some implications of moral development theory for teaching ethics. A summary of moral development theory, focusing on the work of James Rest, provides the basis for our investigation. We conclude that students in a philosophical ethics course experience greater gains in moral reasoning than a control group. However, the large range of students’ moral development results in discrepancies between their developmental level and the more sophisticated level of reasoning around which philosophy curricula are designed. We explore the implications of this for teaching philosophical ethics and discuss teaching strategies that facilitate growth in moral reasoning.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Teaching Goodness.Linnéa Franits - 2006 - Teaching Philosophy 29 (2):81-92.
So We Teach Business Ethics—Do They Learn?Aaron A. Buchko & Kathleen J. Buchko - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics Education 6:119-146.
So We Teach Business Ethics—Do They Learn?Aaron A. Buchko & Kathleen J. Buchko - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics Education 6:119-146.
Developing Engineering Students’ Moral Reasoning Skills Using Problem-Based Learning.Maralee Harrell - 2019 - American Association of Philosophy Teachers Studies in Pedagogy 5:123-143.
Teaching Ethics via Sympathy.Deborah Mower - 2009 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 23 (1):51-60.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-17

Downloads
5 (#1,562,871)

6 months
12 (#243,143)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references