The Potential for Unintended Consequences from Public Policy Shifts in the Treatment of Pain

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 26 (4):350-352 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Recently, due to a number of converging factors, there have been significant shifts in public policy regarding the legitimacy of treating chronic pain with opioids. Traditional tenets handed down in medical, dental, nursing, and pharmacy education created a distinct reluctance on the part of practitioners to prescribe opioids on a continual basis. Much has been written about the reasons for these attitudes. One of the barriers that is very consistently reported by prescribers is the fear of regulatory and legal repercussions to ongoing prescription of this class of medications. It is in this arena that sentinel changes have occurred, the most recent of which is the promulgation of a document prepared by the Federation of State Medical Boards, which suggests a set of guidelines meant to be endorsed or adopted by individual medical licensing boards on how to approach this particular aspect of practice. These guidelines, representing a broad consensus from a wide constituency, were developed in a relatively open forum and detail a balanced approach to the prescription of opioids for chronic pain.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,990

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Pain Management: Texas Legislative and Regulatory Update.David L. Ralston - 1996 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 24 (4):328-337.
Pain Management: Texas Legislative and Regulatory Update.David L. Ralston - 1996 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 24 (4):328-337.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-31

Downloads
15 (#948,666)

6 months
1 (#1,722,767)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Disciplinary Actions and Pain Relief: Analysis of the Pain Relief Act.Sandra H. Johnson - 1996 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 24 (4):319-327.
Disciplinary Actions and Pain Relief: Analysis of the Pain Relief Act.Sandra H. Johnson - 1996 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 24 (4):319-327.
Opioid Therapy for Chronic Nonmalignant Pain: Clinicians' Perspective.Russell K. Portenoy - 1996 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 24 (4):296-309.
Opioid Therapy for Chronic Nonmalignant Pain: Clinicians' Perspective.Russell K. Portenoy - 1996 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 24 (4):296-309.

Add more references