Improving State Medical Board Policies: Influence of a Model

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 31 (1):119-129 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Despite advances in medical knowledge regarding pain management, pain continues to be significantly undertreated in the United States. There are many drug and nondrug treatments, but the use of controlled substances, particularly the opioid analgesics, is universally accepted for the treatment of pain from cancer. Although opioid analgesics are safe and effective in treating chronic pain, there is continued research and discussion about patient selection and long-term effects. A number of barriers in the health care and drug regulatory systems account for the gap between what is known about pain management and what is practiced. Among the barriers are physicians’ fears of being disciplined by state regulatory boards for inappropriate prescribing.State medical boards are in a unique position not only to address physicians’ concerns about being investigated, but also to encourage pain management. Prior to 1989, a few state medical boards had policies relating to controlled substances or pain. Subsequently, state medical boards began adopting policies regarding the prescribing of opioids for the treatment of pain; many of these specifically addressed physicians’ fear of regulatory scrutiny.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The ethics behind medical conferences: a view from India.V. Sharma & A. Sharma - 2010 - Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (7):445-446.
The Future of Conflicts of Interest: A Call for Professional Standards.Bernard Lo - 2012 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 40 (3):441-451.
A state medical board examination in 1816.Charles I. Silin - 1977 - In Chester R. Burns (ed.), Legacies in Law and Medicine. Science History Publications.
Board of director effectiveness committees.Michael L. McIntyre & Steven A. Murphy - 2007 - International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 3 (4):461-472.
Are Director Equity Policies Exclusionary?Dan R. Dalton - 2003 - Business Ethics Quarterly 13 (4):415-432.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
7 (#1,310,999)

6 months
4 (#678,769)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references