Geometry and Mechanics in the Preface to Newton’s Principia

Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 25 (2):119-159 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The first edition of Newton’s Principia opens with a “Praefatio ad Lectorem.” The first lines of this Preface have received scant attention from historians, even though they contain the very first words addressed to the reader of one of the greatest classics of science. Instead, it is the second half of the Preface that historians have often referred to in connection with their treatments of Newton’s scientific methodology. Roughly in the middle of the Preface, Newton defines the purpose of philosophy as a twofold task: to investigate the forces of the phenomena of nature and, once having established the forces, to demonstrate the remaining phenomena. Newton then introduces a distinction between the first two books, which deal with general propositions, and the third, where the propositions are applied to particular instances of celestial phenomena. From these phenomena, Newton claims, the force of gravity, thanks to which bodies tend toward the Sun, is derived. By assuming this force in mathematical propositions, other motions are deduced: the motions of the planets, the comets, the moon, and the sea. Newton then declares his hope that phenomena relative to small particles will also be explained, as per the celestial ones, thanks to the understanding of attractive forces hitherto unknown to philosophers. The Preface ends with a well-deserved laudatio of Edmond Halley and an apologetic passage concerning certain imperfections in the presentation of advanced subjects, such as the motions of the moon. It is these lines to which historians have given most attention in their various studies.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,628

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Force and Geometry in Newton's Principia. [REVIEW]Kenneth R. Westphal - 1998 - Review of Metaphysics 51 (4):923-925.
Descartes, la "Géométrie" de 1637.Vincent Jullien - 1996 - Presses Universitaires de France - PUF.
The Metaphysics of Impenetrability: Euler's Conception of force.Stephen Gaukroger - 1982 - British Journal for the History of Science 15 (2):132-154.
Descartes' Mesolabium. Eine interaktive Simulation.Jörg Ossenkopp - 2011 - Drehmomente. Philosophische Reflexionen Für Sybille Krämer.
Rethinking Newton’s Principia.Simon Saunders - 2013 - Philosophy of Science 80 (1):22-48.
Geometry, Time and Force in the Diagrams of Descartes, Galileo, Torricelli and Newton.Emily R. Grosholz - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:237 - 248.
Euler, Newton, and Foundations for Mechanics.Marius Stan - 2013 - In Chris Smeenk & Eric Schliesser (eds.), Newton's Principia. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. pp. 1-22.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
39 (#406,147)

6 months
6 (#508,040)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references