Ethics and Banking: Do Banks Divest Their Kind?

Journal of Business Ethics:1-33 (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX


A growing group of institutional investors use divestment strategically to deter misconducts that are harmful for the climate and society. Based on Kantian ethics, we propose that divestment represents investors’ universal and absolute moral commitment to socially responsible investing (SRI). Following categorical and hypothetical imperatives and reciprocity as a norm, we hypothesize how institutional investors’ commit to SRI through a divestment strategy against ethically reprehensible behaviour of banks, especially when these investors represent banks themselves. Using a hand-collected database of the revelation dates of enforcement actions on banks, we find evidence that banks are less likely to divest equity holding on banks with misconduct (fined banks) than their non-bank institutional investors peers. Banks that commit to invest responsibly by signing for the Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) are not significantly more likely to divest on fined banks stocks than non-signatory banks. Moreover, divestment of fined banks whose own legitimacy to operate is in question is not significantly different from non-fined banks divestment. We find that European banks are more inclined to sell their holdings permanently on fined banks than their United States peers. Therefore, bank’s moral commitment to SRI via divestments is influenced more by cultural and reciprocity norms than their moral commitment to participate in the PRI.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,347

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

V Chemnitz East Forum 21–23 March 2001 "Human Resource Management in Transition".[author unknown] - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics 26 (4):363-364.
Ethical Issues in Business: Perspectives from the Business Academic Community.[author unknown] - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 52 (2):141-141.
Erratum: Applying the Principles of Gestalt Theory to Teaching Ethics.[author unknown] - 1991 - Journal of Business Ethics 10 (11):880-880.
Introduction.Hart Kevin & Hartman Geoffrey - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 51 (2):101-101.
Editorial: Conferences on Value Inquiry.James B. Wilbur - 1988 - Journal of Business Ethics 7 (6):403-403.
Editorial: Purpose and Policy.Alex C. Michalos - 1982 - Journal of Business Ethics 1 (2):163-163.
Editorial: Purpose and Policy.Alex C. Michalos - 1982 - Journal of Business Ethics 1 (1):1-1.
Editorial: Purpose and Policy.Alex C. Michalos - 1982 - Journal of Business Ethics 1 (4):I-I.


Added to PP

33 (#487,710)

6 months
30 (#107,264)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references