Philosophy Compass 9 (3):194-203 (2014)

Authors
Daniel Groll
Carleton College
Abstract
Medical clinicians – doctors, nurses, nurse practitioners etc. – are charged to act for the good of their patients. But not all ways of acting for a patient's good are on par: some are paternalistic; others are not. What does it mean to act paternalistically, both in general and specifically in a medical context? And when, if ever, is it permissible for a clinician to act paternalistically? In Medical Paternalism Part 1, I answered the first question. This paper answers the second. The place of paternalism in clinical medicine is best understood, I argue, in terms of the potential for conflict between the autonomy principle and the beneficence principle. The first enjoins clinicians to respect the decisions of patients with respect to their (the patients') own care. The second enjoins clinicians to act for the good of their patients. Clinicians act paternalistically, I argue, when they act on the beneficence principle to the exclusion of the autonomy principle. Understanding just what these principles amount to (particularly the autonomy principle) reveals that the autonomy principle defeasibly trumps the beneficence principle and that, as a result, acting paternalistically (at least when it comes to competent patients) is presumptively impermissible
Keywords Paternalism  Autonomy  Medical Ethics  Beneficence
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/phc3.12110
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,160
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Principles of Biomedical Ethics.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1979 - Oxford University Press.
The Morality of Freedom.Joseph Raz - 1986 - Oxford University Press.

View all 19 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

A Normatively Neutral Definition of Paternalism.Emma C. Bullock - 2015 - Philosophical Quarterly 65 (258):1-21.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Paternalism in the Name of Autonomy.Manne Sjöstrand, Stefan Eriksson, Niklas Juth & Gert Helgesson - 2013 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 38 (6):jht049.
Refusal Rights, Law and Medical Paternalism in Turkey.Jessica Flanigan - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (10):636-637.
Medical Paternalism in House M.D.M. R. Wicclair - 2008 - Medical Humanities 34 (2):93-99.
Paternalism Modernised.G. B. Weiss - 1985 - Journal of Medical Ethics 11 (4):184-187.
Paternalism and Democracy.Marion Smiley - 1989 - Journal of Value Inquiry 23 (4):299-318.
Medical Paternalism - Part 1.Daniel Groll - 2014 - Philosophy Compass 9 (3):194-203.
Children, Paternalism and the Development of Autonomy.Amy Mullin - 2014 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (3):413-426.
Limits of Autonomy in Biomedical Ethics? Conceptual Clarifications.Theda Rehbock - 2011 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 20 (4):524-532.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-09

Total views
123 ( #93,797 of 2,499,305 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #118,136 of 2,499,305 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes