Medical Paternalism – Part 2

Philosophy Compass 9 (3):194-203 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Medical clinicians – doctors, nurses, nurse practitioners etc. – are charged to act for the good of their patients. But not all ways of acting for a patient's good are on par: some are paternalistic; others are not. What does it mean to act paternalistically, both in general and specifically in a medical context? And when, if ever, is it permissible for a clinician to act paternalistically? In Medical Paternalism Part 1, I answered the first question. This paper answers the second. The place of paternalism in clinical medicine is best understood, I argue, in terms of the potential for conflict between the autonomy principle and the beneficence principle. The first enjoins clinicians to respect the decisions of patients with respect to their (the patients') own care. The second enjoins clinicians to act for the good of their patients. Clinicians act paternalistically, I argue, when they act on the beneficence principle to the exclusion of the autonomy principle. Understanding just what these principles amount to (particularly the autonomy principle) reveals that the autonomy principle defeasibly trumps the beneficence principle and that, as a result, acting paternalistically (at least when it comes to competent patients) is presumptively impermissible

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,621

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Paternalism in the Name of Autonomy.Manne Sjöstrand, Stefan Eriksson, Niklas Juth & Gert Helgesson - 2013 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 38 (6):jht049.
Refusal rights, law and medical paternalism in Turkey.Jessica Flanigan - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (10):636-637.
Paternalism modernised.G. B. Weiss - 1985 - Journal of Medical Ethics 11 (4):184-187.
Who should decide?: Paternalism in health care.James F. Childress - 1982 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Paternalism and democracy.Marion Smiley - 1989 - Journal of Value Inquiry 23 (4):299-318.
Medical Paternalism - Part 1.Daniel Groll - 2014 - Philosophy Compass 9 (3):194-203.
Children, Paternalism and the Development of Autonomy.Amy Mullin - 2014 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (3):413-426.
Limits of Autonomy in Biomedical Ethics? Conceptual Clarifications.Theda Rehbock - 2011 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 20 (4):524-532.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-09

Downloads
154 (#111,382)

6 months
11 (#126,327)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daniel Groll
Carleton College

References found in this work

Principles of biomedical ethics.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1979 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by James F. Childress.
The Morality of Freedom.Joseph Raz - 1986 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Practical reason and norms.Joseph Raz - 1975 - London: Hutchinson.

View all 19 references / Add more references