Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (10):636-637 (2013)

Authors
Jessica Flanigan
University of Richmond
Abstract
Dr Tolga Guven and Dr Gurkan Sert argue the Turkish legal principles do not give clear guidance about the permissibility of medical paternalism. They then argue that the best interpretation of these principles requires respect for patients’ rights. I agree that medical paternalism is wrong, but the truth of this claim does not depend on legal interpretation or medical culture. Further, the antipaternalist thesis of Guven and Sert may command much more extensive reforms than they acknowledge
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/medethics-2012-100945
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,091
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Three Arguments Against Prescription Requirements.Jessica Flanigan - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (10):579-586.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Rights of Patients in Developing Countries: The Case of Turkey.E. Aydin - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (6):555-557.
Deconstructing Community Self-Paternalism.Jonathan Schonsheck - 1991 - Law and Philosophy 10 (1):29 - 49.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-06-17

Total views
13 ( #769,105 of 2,506,349 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,997 of 2,506,349 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes