Journal of Value Inquiry 23 (4):299-318 (1989)

Marion Smiley
Brandeis University
This essay argues that Dworkin, Feinberg and others who claim exceptions against the principle of paternalism for the sake of preventing seroius physical harm are forced to treat mature adults as mental incompetents and that they are forced to do so by the prevailing concept of paternalism itself. The essay then shows how we can get around this dilemma by re-thinking paternalism as part of distinctly paternal relationships of domination and inequality.
Keywords paternalism  democracy  autonomy  patriarchy
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00136925
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,039
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Paternalism.Gerald Dworkin - 1972 - The Monist 56 (1):64-84.
Paternalism.Gerald Dworkin - 1972 - The Monist.
Paternalism and Autonomy.Douglas N. Husak - 1981 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 10 (1):27-46.
The Principle of Paternalism.John D. Hodson - 1977 - American Philosophical Quarterly 14 (1):61 - 69.
Paternalism.N. Fotion - 1979 - Ethics 89 (2):191-198.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Paternalism, Part II.David J. Garren - 2007 - Philosophical Books 48 (1):50-59.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
118 ( #98,962 of 2,505,224 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,705 of 2,505,224 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes