- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Affectedness and direct objects: The role of lexical semantics in the acquisition of verb argument structure
Cognition 41 (1-3):153-195 (1991)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Affectedness and direct objects : The role of lexical semantics in the acquisition of verb argument structure.Jess Gropen - 1992 - In Beth Levin & Steven Pinker (eds.), Lexical & conceptual semantics. Cambridge, Ma.: Blackwell. pp. 153-195.
Argument Structure Constructions versus Lexical Rules or Derivational Verb Templates.Adele E. Goldberg - 2013 - Mind and Language 28 (4):435-465.
Argument Structure Constructions versus Lexical Rules or Derivational Verb Templates.Adele E. Goldberg - 2013 - Mind and Language 28 (4):435-465.
Why theories of word learning don't always work as theories of verb learning.Letitia R. Naigles - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (6):1113-1114.
The role of emotion in acquisition of verb meaning.Emiko J. Muraki & Penny M. Pexman - forthcoming - Cognition and Emotion.
Arguments for adjuncts.Jean-Pierre Koenig, Gail Mauner & Breton Bienvenue - 2003 - Cognition 89 (2):67-103.
Lexical distributional cues, but not situational cues, are readily used to learn abstract locative verb-structure associations.Katherine E. Twomey, Franklin Chang & Ben Ambridge - 2016 - Cognition 153 (C):124-139.
Book reviews. [REVIEW]Miriam Solomon, Dianne Stober, Robert J. Matthews, Russell Trenholme & Max Velmans - 1993 - Philosophical Psychology 6 (1):97-113.
The faculty of language: what's special about it?/Steven Pinker, Ray Jackendoff.Pinker St - 2005 - Cognition 95:201-236.
Analytics
Added to PP
2018-01-07
Downloads
13 (#288,494)
6 months
8 (#1,326,708)
2018-01-07
Downloads
13 (#288,494)
6 months
8 (#1,326,708)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Event Structures Drive Semantic Structural Priming, Not Thematic Roles: Evidence From Idioms and Light Verbs.Jayden Ziegler, Jesse Snedeker & Eva Wittenberg - 2018 - Cognitive Science 42 (8):2918-2949.
The use of multiple frames in verb learning via syntactic bootstrapping.Letitia R. Naigles - 1996 - Cognition 58 (2):221-251.
Symbolically speaking: a connectionist model of sentence production.Franklin Chang - 2002 - Cognitive Science 26 (5):609-651.
Events and the semantic content of thematic relations.Barry Schein - 2002 - In Gerhard Preyer & Georg Peter (eds.), Logical Form and Language. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. pp. 263--344.
Form is easy, meaning is hard: resolving a paradox in early child language.Letitia R. Naigles - 2002 - Cognition 86 (2):157-199.
References found in this work
On language and connectionism: Analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition.Steven Pinker & Alan Prince - 1988 - Cognition 28 (1-2):73-193.
Productivity and constraints in the acquisition of the passive.Steven Pinker - 1987 - Cognition 26 (3):195-267.
Parts and boundaries.Ray Jackendoff - 1992 - In Beth Levin & Steven Pinker (eds.), Lexical & conceptual semantics. Cambridge, Ma.: Blackwell. pp. 9-45.
The syntax of event structure.James Pustejovsky - 1992 - In Beth Levin & Steven Pinker (eds.), Lexical & conceptual semantics. Cambridge, Ma.: Blackwell. pp. 47-81.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-2nz2h uwo