Imperfect Methods for Imperfect Democracies: Increasing Public Participation in Gene Editing Debates

American Journal of Bioethics 23 (7):77-79 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Given some of the various possible impacts of clinical germline editing, we can expect robust disagreement about how best to regulate it. One can point to examples of the promise of editing: “rough...

Similar books and articles

Imperfect Duties, Group Obligations, and Beneficence.S. Andrew Schroeder - 2014 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 11 (5):557-584.
Public views on gene editing and its uses.Hub Zwart, George Gaskell & Imre Bard - 2017 - Nature Biotechnology 35 (11):121-123.
Rituals are rational for the imperfect experimentalist.M. D. Rutherford - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (6):628-629.
Rediscovering Imperfect Duties.Jacob Nathan Ossar - 2002 - Dissertation, The Johns Hopkins University
The Medical Case for Gene Editing.Julian Savulescu & Christopher Gyngell - 2015 - Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine 6 (1-2):57-66.
Who Goes First? Deaf People and CRISPR Germline Editing.Carol Padden & Jacqueline Humphries - 2020 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 63 (1):54-65.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-06-22

Downloads
141 (#131,262)

6 months
99 (#45,443)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?