How do Scientists Reach Agreement about Novel Observations?

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 17 (2):205 (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I outline a pragmatic view of scientists' use of observation which draws attention to non-discursive, instrumental and social contexts of observation, in order to explain scientists' agreement about the appearance and significance of new phenomena. I argue that: observation is embedded in a network of activities, techniques, and interests; that experimentalists make construals of new phenomena which enable them communicate exploratory techniques and their outcomes, and that empirical enquiry consists of communicative, exploratory and predictive strategies whose interdependence ensures that, notwithstanding the constructedness of representations and the empirical underdetermination of theories, observations contain information about the natural world

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

How Scientists Reach Agreement about New Observations.David Gooding - 1986 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:236-244.
Modeling Developmental Processes in Psychology.Jari-Erik Nurmi - 2013 - Perspectives on Science 21 (2):181-195.
The scientists' criterion of true observation.D. G. Ellson - 1963 - Philosophy of Science 30 (1):41-52.
Philosophy’s Future as a Problem-Solving Discipline.Richard Kamber - 2011 - Essays in Philosophy 12 (2):292-312.
Toward Understanding Reasoned Resolution of Disagreement.Don Fawkes - 2006 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 13 (1):56-62.
Scientists' thoughts on scientific models.Daniela M. Bailer-Jones - 2002 - Perspectives on Science 10 (3):275-301.
On Reason's Reach: Historical Observations.G. Watts Cunningham - 1969 - American Philosophical Quarterly 6 (1):1 - 16.
Argument and agreement in Plato's Crito.Melissa S. Lane - 1998 - History of Political Thought 19 (3):313-330.
Some contributions of philosophy to behavioral sciences.H. W. Reese - 1999 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 20 (2):183-210.
Are debatable scientific questions debatable?John Ziman - 2000 - Social Epistemology 14 (2 & 3):187 – 199.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-02

Downloads
58 (#275,185)

6 months
8 (#351,446)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Experiments in history and philosophy of science.Friedrich Steinle - 2002 - Perspectives on Science 10 (4):408-432.
Heuristics and the generalized correspondence principle.Hans Radder - 1991 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42 (2):195-226.
Visualizing Scientific Inference.David C. Gooding - 2010 - Topics in Cognitive Science 2 (1):15-35.
Credentialing scientific claims.Frederick Suppe - 1993 - Perspectives on Science 1 (2):153-203.

View all 17 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Ian Hacking.
Laboratory Life. The Social Construction of Scientific Facts.Bruno Latour & Steve Woolgar - 1982 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 13 (1):166-170.
The Roots of Reference.W. V. Quine - 1974 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 27 (1):93-96.

View all 19 references / Add more references