Direito de excluir ou dever de acolher? A migração forçada como questão ética

REMHU 50 (25):11-24 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The first aim of this paper is to examine if and why the European reaction to the migration crisis of 2015 can be considered anti-ethical. In order to argue this, the paper discusses the Global Approach to Migration and Mobility (GAMM), which since 2005 has been the EU's overall framework for migration and asylum policies. The second aim of the paper is to justify that an ethics of migration is possible, arguing in favor of the thesis that caring for refugees is a fundamental value for citizenship and a contribution to social justice.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,685

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Dever e inclinação em Kant e Schiller.Charles Feldhaus - 2015 - Ethic@ - An International Journal for Moral Philosophy 14 (3):395-414.
Justicia y Derecho ante la Crisis Social de la Legalidad.Javier Pérez Duarte - 2014 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 70 (2-3):343-360.
Sobre a moralidade do direito em Kant.Joãosinho Beckenkamp - 2009 - Ethic@ - An International Journal for Moral Philosophy 8 (1):63-83.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-08-30

Downloads
24 (#556,634)

6 months
6 (#200,346)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paolo Gomarasca
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references