REMHU 50 (25):11-24 (2017)

Authors
Paolo Gomarasca
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore
Abstract
The first aim of this paper is to examine if and why the European reaction to the migration crisis of 2015 can be considered anti-ethical. In order to argue this, the paper discusses the Global Approach to Migration and Mobility (GAMM), which since 2005 has been the EU's overall framework for migration and asylum policies. The second aim of the paper is to justify that an ethics of migration is possible, arguing in favor of the thesis that caring for refugees is a fundamental value for citizenship and a contribution to social justice.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,177
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Dever e inclinação em Kant e Schiller.Charles Feldhaus - 2015 - [email protected] - An International Journal for Moral Philosophy 14 (3):395-414.
Justicia y Derecho Ante la Crisis Social de la Legalidad.Javier Pérez Duarte - 2014 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 70 (2-3):343-360.
Sobre a moralidade do direito em Kant.Joãosinho Beckenkamp - 2009 - [email protected] - An International Journal for Moral Philosophy 8 (1):63-83.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-08-30

Total views
13 ( #766,183 of 2,499,401 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #418,166 of 2,499,401 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes