Scepsis Scientifica

Garland (1665)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This is an OCR edition without illustrations or index. It may have numerous typos or missing text. However, purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original rare book from You can also preview excerpts from the book there. Purchasers are also entitled to a free trial membership in the General Books Club where they can select from more than a million books without charge. Original Published by: Kegan Paul, Trench & Co. in 1885 in 311 pages; Subjects: Philosophy; Knowledge, Theory of; Philosophy, English; Philosophy / General; Philosophy / Epistemology; Philosophy / History & Surveys / Modern; Religion / Christian Theology / General;



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,479

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On Antigonus's Letter to Scepsis.J. P. Mahaffy - 1900 - The Classical Review 14 (01):54-.
The Vanity of Dogmatizing.Joseph Glanvill - 1931 - New York: Pub. For the Facsimile Text Society by Columbia University Press.
What are heart attacks? Rethinking some aspects of medical knowledge.David Greaves - 1998 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 1 (2):133-141.
Knowledge and evidence.John Hyman - 2006 - Mind 115 (460):891-916.
Kant's Theory of Knowledge.Justus Hartnack - 1968 - Melbourne [Etc.]Macmillan.
Soviet Theory of Knowledge.Thomas J. Blakeley - 1964 - Dordrecht: Holland, D. Reidel Pub. Co..


Added to PP

1 (#1,501,911)

6 months
1 (#455,463)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Margaret Cavendish and Joseph Glanvill: science, religion, and witchcraft.Jacqueline Broad - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 38 (3):493-505.
Boyle on seminal principles.Peter R. Anstey - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 33 (4):597-630.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references