Robert Hooke's ‘Memoranda’: Memory and natural history

Annals of Science 49 (1):47-61 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The organ of the memory was of crucial importance for Robert Hooke in his aim to improve natural history and the study of nature in general. As a mechanist he was careful to avoid the confident analogizing of his contemporaries, and he described his model in hypothetical form. However, he saw it as amenable to improvement—just as mechanically as the senses were augmented by the use of instruments. The close connection he made between a better memory mechanism and the task of ‘perfecting’ the study of natural philosophy can be seen in a whole range of his activities. These included his discussion of the memory as an epistemological tool, his frequent use of devices such as lists and schemata for ordering aspects of nature and his personal memoranda. His diary, by acting as a stimulant to memory, should be seen as an integral part of his attempt to become a better natural philosopher. Both the act of daily inscription and the ordering of occurrences for effective later recall would improve his memory and his performance of his life's task as a philosopher of nature

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-20

Downloads
23 (#584,438)

6 months
2 (#668,348)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Philosophy and Memory Traces: Descartes to Connectionism.John Sutton - 1998 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Robert Hooke at 371.Rhodri Lewis - 2006 - Perspectives on Science 14 (4):558-573.
Material doubts: Hooke, artisan culture and the exchange of information in 1670s London.Rob Iliffe - 1995 - British Journal for the History of Science 28 (3):285-318.

Add more citations

References found in this work

An essay concerning human understanding.John Locke - 1689 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Pauline Phemister.
The philosophical writings of Descartes.René Descartes - 1984 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Atomism in England from Hariot to Newton.Robert Hugh Kargon - 1967 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 18 (2):160-161.
The philosophical works of Francis Bacon.Francis Bacon - 1905 - Freeport, N.Y.,: Books for Libraries Press. Edited by Robert Leslie Ellis, James Spedding & J. M. Robertson.
Scepsis scientifica.Joseph Glanvill - 1665 - New York: Garland.

View all 6 references / Add more references