- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Good Knowledge, Bad Knowledge: On Two Dogmas of Epistemology
Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press (2001)
Abstract
What is knowledge? How hard is it for a person to have knowledge? Good Knowledge, Bad Knowledge confronts contemporary philosophical attempts to answer those classic questions, offering a theory of knowledge that is unique in conceiving of knowledge in a non-absolutist way.Author's Profile
Reprint years
2002
Call number
BD161.H44 2001
ISBN(s)
019924734X 9780199247349
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Chapters
Knowing about knowledge
Epistemologists usually talk of their theories of knowledge as articulating their understanding of knowledge. Do they thereby take themselves to have knowledge of knowledge? Is a true theory of knowledge a piece of knowledge about knowledge? It should be. But how likely are epistemological... see more
Similar books and articles
Review of Stephen Hetherington, Good Knowledge, Bad Knowledge: On Two Dogmas of Epistemology. [REVIEW]Richard Feldman - 2002 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2002 (8).
Good Knowledge, Bad Knowledge: On Two Dogmas of Epistemology.Bruce W. Brower - 2004 - International Philosophical Quarterly 44 (1):107-108.
Phenomenal epistemology: What is consciousness that we may know it so well?Terry Horgan & Uriah Kriegel - 2007 - Philosophical Issues 17 (1):123-144.
The Distinction between Knowledge-That and Knowledge-How.Huiming Ren - 2012 - Philosophia 40 (4):857-875.
5.Stephen Hetherington - 2006 - In How to Know (That Knowledge-That is Knowledge-How). Oxford University Press. pp. 71-94.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
157 (#84,699)
6 months
6 (#144,946)
2009-01-28
Downloads
157 (#84,699)
6 months
6 (#144,946)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Reliabilism and the Value of Knowledge.Alvin I. Goldman & Erik J. Olsson - 2009 - In Adrian Haddock, Alan Millar & Duncan Pritchard (eds.), Epistemic Value. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 19--41.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5c86f9596c-qsn25 N