Good knowledge, bad knowledge: on two dogmas of epistemology

New York: Oxford University Press (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What is knowledge? How hard is it for a person to have knowledge? Good Knowledge, Bad Knowledge confronts contemporary philosophical attempts to answer those classic questions, offering a theory of knowledge that is unique in conceiving of knowledge in a non-absolutist way.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,726

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
183 (#111,420)

6 months
11 (#349,325)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stephen Hetherington
University of New South Wales

Citations of this work

Know-How and Gradability.Carlotta Pavese - 2017 - Philosophical Review 126 (3):345-383.
The Express Knowledge Account of Assertion.John Turri - 2011 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (1):37-45.
Competence to know.Lisa Miracchi - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (1):29-56.

View all 67 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references