- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Doping, Debunking, and Drawing the Line
Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 15 (2):160-184 (2020)
Abstract
The current ban on certain performance enhancing substances in sport such as erythropoietin faces a line-drawing problem: what is the moral difference between taking an EPO injection to incre...Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Can a Ban on Doping in Sport be Morally Justified?Sigmund Loland - 2011 - In Julian Savulescu, Ruud ter Meulen & Guy Kahane (eds.), Enhancing Human Capacities. Blackwell. pp. 326–331.
Neuro-Doping – a Serious Threat to the Integrity of Sport?Verner Møller & Ask Vest Christiansen - 2020 - Neuroethics 14 (2):159-168.
Performance-Enhancing Drugs, Sport, and the Ideal of Natural Athletic Performance.Sigmund Loland - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (6):8-15.
The Ethics of Doping: Between Paternalism and Duty.Evangelos D. Protopapadakis - 2020 - Pannoniana: Journal of Humanities 4 (1):35-49.
Le Tour and Failure of Zero Tolerance.Julian Savulescu & Bennett Foddy - 2011 - In Julian Savulescu, Ruud ter Meulen & Guy Kahane (eds.), Enhancing Human Capacities. Blackwell. pp. 304–312.
An Alternative Solution to Lifting the Ban on Doping: Breaking the Payoff Matrix of Professional Sport by Shifting Liability Away from Athletes.Silvia Camporesi - 2017 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 11 (1):109-118.
Unnatural Technology in a “Natural” Practice? Human Nature and Performance-Enhancing Technology in Sport.Francisco Javier Lopez Frias - 2019 - Philosophies 4 (3):35.
Are You Game – Theoretically? A Critical Discussion of A Game-theory-based Argument in Favour of Banning Doping.Thomas Søbirk Petersen - 2022 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 16 (4):563-574.
Are You Game – Theoretically? A Critical Discussion of A Game-theory-based Argument in Favour of Banning Doping.Thomas Søbirk Petersen - 2022 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 16 (4):563-574.
Doping in sports: Old problem, new faces.Mike McNamee - 2007 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 1 (3):263 – 265.
Analytics
Added to PP
2020-02-26
Downloads
34 (#485,615)
6 months
15 (#185,276)
2020-02-26
Downloads
34 (#485,615)
6 months
15 (#185,276)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
References found in this work
A Darwinian dilemma for realist theories of value.Sharon Street - 2006 - Philosophical Studies 127 (1):109-166.
Intuition and the Autonomy of Philosophy.George Bealer - 1998 - In Michael DePaul & William Ramsey (eds.), Rethinking Intuition: The Psychology of Intuition and Its Role in Philosophical Inquiry. Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 201-240.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-s5tms uwo