Abstract

This chapter critically looks at the moral reasons for banning the use of performance‐enhancing drugs in sport. It examines whether a ban can be properly justified from a moral point of view. The chapter sketches how intuitively appealing arguments in support of the ban need modification. It then proposes a framework in which traditional arguments can be combined in a systematic way to justify the ban on doping in sport. Stronger arguments in favor of the ban can be found in the view of doping as a health hazard and as implying a significant risk of harm. A moral standpoint towards doping needs to build on an interpretation of what sports or more precisely what athletic performances are all about. The chapter discusses the implications of the thick theory of athletic performance when it comes to doping in sport.